I just took the test and the correct answer is: A-there aren't many clear-cut internal consequences for mistakes
Answer:
the strings the woodwinds.
Explanation:
Answer:
no
Explanation:
porque si no vamos a tener una problema con la gente con matrimonio
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
From the above statement, it is clear that maria saw an emergency vehicle racing down the street with sirens blaring.
All the Options above explains what somebody is staying concerning what maria saw, which was an emergency vehicle racing down the street with sirens. The best way to modifier the scenario is first stating what maria saw, which was "An emergency vehicle", what happened to the emergency vehicle, "It was racing down the street with sirens blaring".
So therefore, the option that best fits my explanation above is Option D
" Racing down the street , maria saw an emergency vehicle with sirens blaring".
All other options keeps repeating the scenario of racing down the street, which is not grammatically correct, only option D explains perfecting without repetition what maria saw racing down the street.
Answer:
Encoding specificity
Explanation:
Godden and Baddeley found that if you study on land, you do better when tested on land, and if you study underwater, you do better when tested underwater. This finding is an example of Encoding specificity
Encoding specificity is a state where human memories are more easily gotten if external conditions at the time of getting it is similar to those in existence at the time the memory was stored.
Studying under water when tested makes you do better. Studying on land makes you do better tested on land
