Contribution=Selling Price*Contribution Ratio
=25*.06
=$15
Variable Expense=Sales-Contribution
=25-15
$10
When Selling price=$28
Contribution=$28*.06
=$16.8
Variable Expense=28-16.8
=$11.2
Increase in variable=11.2-10
=$1.2
Answer:
Answer for the question:
Consider Optitron Enterprises, a firm that is currently funded entirely with equity. There are 50 million shares outstanding and each share has a current market value of $15. Eric Fredrickson, the CEO, has considered whether the company should take on some debt, as he has learned in his Executive MBA class that some debt can increase shareholder value. Mr. Fredrickson has estimated that the current risk free rate is 1.9% and the expected return on a broad market portfolio is 9%. The company’s marginal tax rate is 40% and its operating beta (also known as unlevered beta) is 0.75. Mr. Fredrickson has contacted an investment banker who has analyzed the firm’s operational risk and financial condition. The investment banker has provided the following schedule of anticipated debt costs at various levels of debt financing. Optitron would use any proceeds from a debt issue to immediately retire outstanding equity by repurchasing shares, also known as a recapitalization. wd rd 0 0.0% 0.20 6.5% 0.40 7.5% 0.60 8.5% 0.80 9.5% 1. Using the Hamada equation, estimate the firm’s beta at each level of debt. 2. Using the CAPM, estimate the firm’s cost of equity at each level of debt.
is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Since there is not enough room here, I prepared the financial statement effects template on an excel spreadsheet that I attached.
a)
January 1, unearned revenue
Dr Cash 30,150
Cr Unearned service revenue 30,150
b)
January 31, accrued services
Dr Unearned service revenue 5,025
Cr Service revenue 5,025
c)
January 31, service revenue from hourly custodial work
Dr Accounts receivable 570
Cr Service revenue 570
Answer:
$795.5
Explanation:
To calculate how much 0.9% income they have to pay, the law says anybody that earns above 250000 as married couple is entitled to pay above 0.9%, so for them we will subtract the 250000 from it and also Ruth loss of 13,500
So we have;
(3520000-13500-250000)*0.9%=
$796.5
I can say that the given statement above would be TRUE. What makes this statement true is that, when you have these unnecessary debts, this makes you pay more interest on your debt than you could pay for your investments, thus, ruining your investment opportunities.