Answer:
lol i knew it then had to do something and forgot
Explanation:
Answer:
risk management policy statement
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this list is known as a risk management policy statement. Like mentioned in the question, this is a documentation that clearly states all the risks and hazards involved when performing a specific task. Companies such as Paula's Agri-Products Company use these policies in order to define these risks and let all of the employees know about them.
Answer:
I beleive this one would be a bit of a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, but personally I would call it a bit unethical.
Explanation:
Escpecially when it comes to something like medication, it feels unethical to be advertising yourself as the only brand that will work. In my mind unique selling proposition would be focusing on what differentiates your product from others (example, my product can provide 48 hour vs other brands that only offer 24 hour) Simply stating their brand is the only solution feels unethical and does not provide ample evidence of this claim to customers in my opinion. I don't think it would be considered illegal, but in my mind its tiptoeing the line of ethics.
Answer:
f. None of the choices will be reported as ordinary business income (loss) on Schedule K-1.
Explanation:
Note: Guaranteed payments have no effect on Kim's outside basis.
Bright Line LLC will be reporting on page 1 of Form 1065, an ordinary loss of $15,000 ($150000 - $90000 - $45000 - $30000)
1/3rd of $15,000 = $5,000. That is, $5,000 loss must be allocated to Kim on Schedule K-1. So, option f is the correct answer.
This is an opinion question; therefore there is no right or wrong answer.
You might want to consider talking about:
1. benefits
2. discrimination
3. support
4. employee engagement
