1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaK [193]
3 years ago
8

HELP ME PLEASE I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!

Business
1 answer:
Sav [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I beleive this one would be a bit of a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, but personally I would call it a bit unethical.

Explanation:

Escpecially when it comes to something like medication, it feels unethical to be advertising yourself as the only brand that will work. In my mind unique selling proposition would be focusing on what differentiates your product from others (example, my product can provide 48 hour vs other brands that only offer 24 hour) Simply stating their brand is the only solution feels unethical and does not provide ample evidence of this claim to customers in my opinion. I don't think it would be considered illegal, but in my mind its tiptoeing the line of ethics.

You might be interested in
When the average unit cost of a good or service decreases as the capacity and/or volume of throughput increases, it is known as
Sergeu [11.5K]
(d.) ECONOMIES OF SCALE

Economies of scale is achieved when the average goods and services decrease whereas the volume of the goods and services increases.
Diseconomies of scale is achieved when the average unit cost of goods and services increases with the increase in the volume of goods and services.

5 0
3 years ago
What do of the terms “frequent, likely, occasional, seldom, and unlikely” describe in the risk assessment matrix?
Y_Kistochka [10]
Frequent, likely, occasional, seldom, and unlikely are the five categories of probability in the Risk Assessment Matrix which means the likeliness that an adverse or critical event will occur. The purpose of Risk Assessment Matrix is to estimate the degree of severity and probability for each hazard.



4 0
3 years ago
Some poople argue that the only beneficiary of the entrepreneurial wealth is the entreprenceur him/herselt Do you agree? Why or
Ugo [173]

I do not agree that “the only beneficiary of the entrepreneurial wealth is the entrepreneur him/herself.”

The entrepreneur may be the chief beneficiary when she is alive to reap the rewards of their entrepreneurial efforts. But, she is certainly not the only beneficiary of the entrepreneurial wealth that she creates. Nobody works in isolation. When the entrepreneur commences her business, society as a whole benefits because any individual wealth created increases the wealth of the nation and the world. She only gets the profit share of the created wealth. Customers who patronize her services and goods also derive satisfaction of needs (utility or value). The entrepreneur's wealth is also shared to the government in form of taxes. Suppliers of primary goods and services also share in the wealth of the entrepreneur. And employees of the entrepreneur also take a large share of the created wealth.

But, who is an entrepreneur? She is somebody who assumes some entrepreneurial (first-time) risks in order to set up a business for the manufacture or provision of goods and services for the purpose of profit. Her business may not be profitable in the short-run. She can even lose tons of money initially until the profit stage sets in. As she preserves, the profits will start rolling in, provided she had done her homework well.

8 0
3 years ago
At p1y1, if taxes decrease then consumer spending will decrease and ad will shift right to long-run equilibrium. decrease and ad
Gemiola [76]

Answer: Increase and ad will shift right to long-run equilibrium.

Explanation: A decrease in Taxes lead to an increase in the disposable income of the consumers. This results in higher consumer spending at the given income levels. As a result the AD curve shifts to the right towards the long run equilibrium level.

3 0
3 years ago
An economy that is currently in equilibrium and at full employment has an increase in Disposable income of $50 billion. If the m
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

$250 billion.

Explanation:

The computation in the increase in real GDP is shown below:

Given that

MPC = 80% or 0.80

Income multiplier = 1 ÷ (1 - MPC )

= 1 ÷ (1 -0.80 )

= 1 ÷ 0.20

= 5

Now

The Increase in disposable income is $50 billion

So,

The Increase in real GDP is

= 50 × 5

= $250 billion

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On July 1, Shady Creek Resort borrowed $340,000 cash by signing a 10-year, 9% installment note requiring equal payments each Jun
    14·1 answer
  • Pepsi True is a new cola from Pepsi-Cola that is sweetened with a combination of sugar and stevia leaf extract, resulting in a s
    7·1 answer
  • Henrietta classifies and divides work into manageable units by determining the specific tasks necessary to introduce a new produ
    6·1 answer
  • A stock brokerage firm is a licensed financial institution that select one:
    10·1 answer
  • Javier spends all his income on peanuts and chewing gum. The last dollar spent on peanuts yeilds 14 utils and the last dollar sp
    9·1 answer
  • Hiro sells building materials to local contractors. He wants to build longterm relationships with his contractors through effect
    5·1 answer
  • Steve manages product design and development at a toy company. The junior managers who report to him tell him that new complemen
    11·1 answer
  • ABC purchased equipment for $60,000 on January 1, 2018. The equipment is expected to have a five-year life, with a residual valu
    5·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    5·1 answer
  • These were kane's only temporary differences. in kane's 2021 income statement, the deferred portion of its provision for income
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!