1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jarptica [38.1K]
3 years ago
12

How did cash-and-carry and Lend-Lease differ, and which was more beneficial to the Allies?

History
1 answer:
AysviL [449]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Lend-Lease was beneficial

Explanation:

There was a difference between the Cash and Carry and Lend Lease policies. Both were introduced during Second World War. The Cash and Carry policy performed in 1939 to aid the Allies and preserve neutrality. It allows the sale of American military equipment to countries like Britain and France on a “cash-and-carry”. They had to pay cash for American supplies and transport it on their ships.

Lend-Lease policy also assisted allied nation with military supplies like tanks, ammunition, aeroplanes, and trucks. The policy meant for lend and lease not for sell. It benefited the Allied because they did not have to pay for these items.

You might be interested in
This is the question ill give brainliest
forsale [732]

Answer:

Explanation:i think one

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did soldiers adapt to the use of chemical weapons?
BabaBlast [244]

They began to wear protective masks and clothing.

5 0
3 years ago
What is Plato's critique of democracy? Do you agree or disagree with his critique? why or why not?
Olegator [25]

Answer:

I agree with Plato's critique of democracy because...

then you have to finish that, there's not a lot or any background information but I'm always happy to help if you add more!!!! lmk how you do!!!

7 0
2 years ago
Why is history so important to study?
valina [46]
You can learn about the past and how you can improve on what happened in the past so it won't happen in the future
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had no power to:
otez555 [7]
C. Collect Taxes
Congress could not collect taxes from the states and depended on the states for money. If the state denied the money, Congress could do nothing.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What advanced cities did the Toltec build?
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes a major impact of the U.S. Constitution?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the US government balance the need to ration food for military use during World War I with traditional civil liberties?
    13·1 answer
  • What is all over Europe?
    5·1 answer
  • Where was General Howe victorious?
    10·2 answers
  • Which is not necessary in a historical essay?
    10·1 answer
  • 4. What was Columbus trying to find in his expedition? I
    6·1 answer
  • The fire alarm woke me.
    13·2 answers
  • Branliest to who ever is right!!
    10·1 answer
  • Why was saladin significant within the medieval period
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!