1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jarptica [38.1K]
3 years ago
12

How did cash-and-carry and Lend-Lease differ, and which was more beneficial to the Allies?

History
1 answer:
AysviL [449]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Lend-Lease was beneficial

Explanation:

There was a difference between the Cash and Carry and Lend Lease policies. Both were introduced during Second World War. The Cash and Carry policy performed in 1939 to aid the Allies and preserve neutrality. It allows the sale of American military equipment to countries like Britain and France on a “cash-and-carry”. They had to pay cash for American supplies and transport it on their ships.

Lend-Lease policy also assisted allied nation with military supplies like tanks, ammunition, aeroplanes, and trucks. The policy meant for lend and lease not for sell. It benefited the Allied because they did not have to pay for these items.

You might be interested in
Which describes the tactics of the Cherokee people used to keep their land in Georgia
TEA [102]
They formed a government, wrote a constitution, and adopted some white ways.
4 0
3 years ago
Does the First Amendment permit the Minnesota Supreme Court to prohibit candidates for judicial election in that State from anno
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

<em>According to G00GLE, and I quote*:   " The Minnesota Supreme Court's canon of judicial conduct prohibiting candidates for judicial election from announcing their views on disputed legal and political issues violates the First Amendment. "</em>

<em></em>

<em></em>

<em></em>

<em></em>

<em></em>

<em></em>

<em>* </em><em>thanks to Cornell Law School for the awesome answer, all credit due there. </em>

4 0
3 years ago
What are states' rights?
lbvjy [14]

Answer:the powers that are not specifically assigned to the federal government

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Pls help asap, giving Brainliest!!!!! :)
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

C. and A

Explanation:

hope this helps

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The importance of Judaism in modern Western government is the:
Morgarella [4.7K]
Is there any answer choices ?
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The constitutions written by the states provided several important precedents for the later federal system created by the Consti
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Patriot Act controversial?
    6·2 answers
  • The men we call patriots would have been called traitors if England had won the war.
    15·2 answers
  • Shah Abbas revitalized the Safavid regime by all of the following means EXCEPT
    15·1 answer
  • Why was it difficult to negotiate a fair treaty with native people?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following documents was responsible for limiting the power of King John in 1215? A. the Magna Carta B. the English
    12·2 answers
  • DAILY NEWS 1887
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Red Scare during the Cold War?
    10·1 answer
  • Basic biographical information about Henry ford
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!