The answers are C and D: storm and bird.
Emily Dickinson talked a lot about <em>nature</em>. In this excerpt from "Hope is the Thing with Feathers" the nouns<em> storm and bird</em> are presented.
Bird (<em>represents </em><em>Hope </em><em> that never stops, is sweetest in the Gale, and keep so many warm</em>): "'Hope' is the thing with feathers"; "that perches in the soul"; "sings the tune without words"
Storm (<em>an agitated </em><em>soul </em>): "And sore must be the storm --that could abash the little Bird.
Hello.
The answer is
<span>A.The literary device used in this sentence is imagery.
Its not a simile becasue there is no like or as.
Its not personfaction because you need a animal or plant that has human qualty.
Its not a methpor becasue that could be real.
So its "T</span><span>he literary device used in this sentence is imagery."
Have a nice day</span>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
After reading the passge, it seems ironic that Ulrich would offer Georg wine because they are enemies. In which case, it should be C.
The language is a major part of our culture . the world has many languages. And you can say they are almost different in different regions. Let me give you an example there are different methods of how a people think. As if when a Spanish is thinking she makes the sound like ... eh... well the same sound if made before the British people then they take it is a bad culturee.. that is opening your mouth before ssomeone.
So its like they are habituated to their own language. Even one culture's usual thing can be other cultures bad side.
The ways for which the languages are changing ...
One of the most important reason is the use of Social media or Chatting.
When you are chatting you are using a different language. And the people are now getting habituated in changing the words spelling pronunciationa nd much more. New words are added to the dictionary.
If the language I spoke disappeared then
Maybe the world would seem like another planet to me.
Every people would think of me as a uncultured person.
But you can also write,
The language is already disappearing. As the people are mixing so many languages together. The 5-7 sentences am posting as attachment. Hope that helps.
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that only you can complete. However, we are still able to provide some guidance that can help you complete your work.
In her "Letter to Napoleon III," Elizabeth Barrett Browning employs several rhetorical strategies to urge Napoleon III to forgive the author Victor Hugo and free him from his imprisonment.
Browning uses ethos when she presents herself as a fair person. Ethos refers to an appeal to credibility, and Browning employs it when she agrees with Napoleon about the wrong nature of Victor Hugo's actions. She also employs a paradox to force Napoleon to pay close attention to her argument. The paradox is that, even though Victor Hugo acted against the emperor, he deserves to be free. Browning employs anaphora when she repeats the phrase "what touches you" in order to convince Napoleon of the importance of his reputation. Finally, she uses pathos (an appeal to emotion) when she highlights how grateful and admiring Napoleon's subjects will be if he pardons Victor Hugo.