A number is a perfect square (or a square number) if its square root is an integer; that is to say, it is the product of an integer with itself. Here, the square root of 20 is about 4.472. Thus, the square root of 20 is not an integer, and therefore 20 is not a square number.
-4 and -5
because to get 16 to 12 you have to subtract 4 but it wants you to add so you put a negative sign infront of it.
and a negative multiply by a negative equals a positive so -3×-5=15
Assume that you only include whole numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and not 3.5 and such
so if 1 is odd and less than 5 then it is
1 or 3, since 5 isn't included
then the other number, to be less than 5 when added,
must be
1+x<5
3+x<5
solve each
1+x<5
subtract 1
x<4
set of answers are 1,2,3
3+x<5
subtract 3
x<2
set of answer is 1
so the possible numbers are
1,2,3
that is 3 numbesr out of 9 so
probability=(total desired outcomes)/(total possible outcomes) so
disred outcomes=3
total possible=9
3/9=1/3
the probabiltiy is 1/3
400×10=4000
400×2=800
50×10=500
50×2=100
2×10=20
2×2=4
4000+800+500+100+20+4=5,424
Check answer by multiplying 452 and 12
452×12=5,424
Answer:
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
Step-by-step explanation:
The sample proportion is p2= 7/27= 0.259
and q2= 0.74
The sample size = n= 27
The population proportion = p1= 0.4
q1= 0.6
We formulate the null and alternate hypotheses that the new program is effective
H0: p2> p1 vs Ha: p2 ≤ p1
The test statistic is
z= p2- p1/√ p1q1/n
z= 0.259-0.4/ √0.4*0.6/27
z= -0.141/0.09428
z= -1.496
The significance level ∝ is 0.05
The critical region for one tailed test is z ≤ ± 1.645
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
