Answer:
Explanation:
1. Both these historians think that our history is something important, something that needs to be remembered.
2. These historians both agree that it is important to remember the past. They both agree that we learn from our mistakes of what happened in the past and that it will help determine our future.
You would probably need to expand on these answers but I hope this helps.
I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
I think you’re the only one who could do this lol
