Answer:
A residential property is greatly diminished in value because of the constant noise of jets taking off from a recently expanded municipal airport. In order to be compensated for this loss, the owner could:
B.bring a suit alleging inverse condemnation
Explanation:
A law suit is a claim or legal problem taken to a court of law by an individual or organization rather than the authorities for a legal decision to be made. In the case above, the residential property diminished in value after constant noise of jets taking off from a recently expanded municipal airport. The loss in value is as a result of the recently expanded municipal airport and the property owner wants to be compensated for this loss.
In law, there are different terminologies and phrases that have specific meaning, some of them are as follows;
1. Inverse condemnation
Inverse condemnation is a case where a government entity takes private property or influences the value of that private property in one way or another then fails to compensate. In our case, this law suit can apply since the municipal airport is under the jurisdiction of the government and there action of expanding the airport caused a decline in value of neighboring residential property thus they should compensate the owner for this loss. The owner can bring a suit alleging inverse compensation.
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
Endorsing a check is communicating to the bank how a check is to be cashed. A restrictive endorsement puts limits on how a check or other financial instruments are to be used.
The most common type of restrictive endorsement is for the payee to write the words" for deposit only" at the back of the check. The payee then signs and indicates their account number. This instructs the banks to pay the check amount to that account.
Sandra walker should write the words "for deposits only" at the back of the check. She has to indicate the bank account number for The Book Nook and sign at the back.
Answer:
$69,000
Explanation:
The computation of the operating income would be shown below:
= Buying cost - making cost
where,
Buying cost equals to
= 60,000 × $3
= $180,000
And, the making cost would be
= Variable cost + fixed cost × avoid percentage
= $90,000 + $70,000 × 30%
= $90,000 + $21,000
= $111,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $180,000 - $111,000
= $69,000
Answer:
$208
Explanation:
Using the FIFO Inventory method, inventory items are assumed to be sold in the order in which they were purchased from the earliest to the latest.
The order of purchase of the inventory items are.
Jun. 1, DVD Player 1012, $113
Nov. 1, DVD Player 1045, $95
Nov. 31, DVD Player 1056, $88
Therefore, if two of the three items are sold, the cost of goods sold is the cost of the first two items purchased
= 113 + 95 = $208.
