The correct answer is 2.2 hours.
I<span>f Eva uses the earliest due date priority rule, the order of the dresses will be as follows: W (1 hour processing time, 1 hour due); Y (2 hrs processing time, 3 hrs due); V (3 hrs processing time, 5 hrs due); Z (5 hrs processing time, 7 hrs due); X (4 hrs processing time, 9 hrs due).</span>
It's easier to do the next step using real numbers. For example, if it's 11am now and W is due in 1 hour, then W is due at noon. If Y is due in 3 hours, then Y is due at 2pm, etc. Then, you need to use the processing time to see how long it will take to make the dresses. For example, since W takes one hour to process, it will be done by noon, its due date.
This means that W and Y will be altered on time, V will be 1 hour late, Z will be 4 hours late, and X will be 6 hours late. To find the average tardiness, add these extra hours (1+4+6) = 11, and divide by the total number of dresses (even the ones that weren't late) 5: 11/5 = 2.2 hours.
Answer:
Yes, Adam committed a tort.
Explanation:
In the situation, when Adam kisses the sleeve of Eve's blouse but without her consent, he committed a tort. A tort can be defined as a civil wrong which harm other. Here, Adam's act of kissing the sleeve was an invasion of Eve's privacy. It also caused her emotional distress. Therefore Adam has a legal liability in this case as it is tort.
The amount of cost of goods sold using FIFO method is $110,000.
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
A. D1 = 1.50*1.06 = 1.59
D2 = 1.59*1.06 = 1.69
D3 = 1.69*1.06 = 1.79
B. PV of D1=(1.50*1.06)/1.13^1=1.41
PV of D2=(1.50*1.06^2)/1.13^2=1.32
PV of D3=(1.50*1.06^3)/1.13^3=1.24
PV of all dividend = (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1 + (1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2 + (1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3
PV of all dividend = 1.59/1.13 + 1.6854/1.2769 + 1.786524/1.442897
PV of all dividend = 1.407079646 + 1.319915 + 1.238150748
PV of all dividend = 3.965145814288893
PV of all dividend = 3.97
C. PV = 27.05/(1+13%)^3
PV = 27.05/(1.13)^3
PV = 27.05/1.442897
PV = 18.74701
PV = 18.75
D. The most you should pay for it
:
= (1.50*1.06)/1.13^1+(1.5*1.06^2)/1.13^2+(1.5*1.06^3)/1.13^3+27.05/1.13^3
=22.71
E. Value = (1.50*1.06)/(13%-6%)
Value = 1.59 / 7%
Value = 1.59 / 0.07
Value = 22.714286
Value =22.71
F. No, the value is not dependent on the holding period, you can see from above that the value of infinite time period estimated in E equals to the value calculated when there was 3 years holding period.
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
