2 years ago

Take a look at the picture. Please write your explanation.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Vanyuwa [196]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

number of fourths in 3, 3÷ 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

It shows 3 split up into fourths, 3÷ 1/4 equals 12 which is the amount of sections there are

You might be interested in

2. Trouvaughn bought b bags of oranges, which cost 80 cents per bag. If Trouvaughn paid with a

Damm [24]

Amount that trouvaughn paid : $0.80b
ten dollar bill = $10

so $(10-0.80b)

5 0

3 years ago

Enter the simplified form of the complex fraction in the box. Assume no denominator equals zero.

Olenka [21]

Answer:

$\frac{(9-x)}{3x}$

Step-by-step explanation:

we have

$\frac{\frac{2}{x-3}-\frac{3}{x}}{\frac{3}{x-3}}$

step 1

Solve the numerator of the quotient

$\frac{2}{x-3}-\frac{3}{x}=\frac{2x-3(x-3)}{(x-3)x}=\frac{2x-3x+9}{(x-3)x}=\frac{9-x}{(x-3)x}$

step 2

substitute in the original expression

$\frac{\frac{9-x}{(x-3)x}}{\frac{3}{x-3}}$

$\frac{(x-3)(9-x)}{3x(x-3)}$

step 3

simplify

$\frac{(9-x)}{3x}$

5 0

2 years ago

Lucy's family purchased one sweatshirt and 4 t-shirts for $110. Mark's family bought three sweat-shirts and 4 t-shirts for $200.

omeli [17]

T-shirt are 20 each and sweatshirt are 30

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is not an empirical formula?<br> O C8H10N402<br> O C3H8<br> OMg3N2<br> O H2O

GalinKa [24]

Answer:

d..

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Mandy and Pete have a biased spinner numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. They each want to find an estimate for the probability that the spi

kotykmax [81]

Answer:

Pete

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Mandy's Estimate :

Number of spins , n = 20

Pete's Estimate:

Number of spins, n = 200

A good probability estimate is one which has narrow margin of error with a high degree of confidence. These two variables are affected by sample size.

A high sample size give a narrower margin of error and increases the confidence level probability

Based on the sample size used by each of Pete and Mandy, we can conclude that, Pete's probability estimate would be better due to its significantly higher sample size.

5 0

3 years ago