What's your question here? Im not understanding what your asking here.
Answer:
2 he did not judge the people he knew who were making poor decisions
Explanation:
I incline to Cain's heresy he used to say. I let my brother go to the devil in his quaintly own way. In this character it was frequently his fortune to be the last reputable acquaintance and the last good influence in the lives of down going men. And to such as these so long as they come about his chambers he never marked a shade of change in his demeanor
The rhetorics shows that he wasn't so much concerned about other peoples decision. We gave tolerance to everybody despite there paradigm and inclinations.
2 he did not judge the people he knew who were making poor decisions
It couldn't be 1 because it didn't do that. He couldn't be 3 because the passage didn't showed that he studied anyone's actions. it is not 4 because he was quite neutral about what his fellows believed in
<span>C is the answer. Carl Sandburg is the simple subject because he is the main focus of the simple sentence ‘Carl Sandburg was born’. ’The now famous Carl Sandburg’ is a complete subject. ‘Was born’ is the simple predicate and ‘was born in 1878 in Galesburg, Illinois’ is the complete predicate.</span>
Hey there!
I believe the answer is the 1st one
Can you be a little more specific?
