A. Companies have the information they need to effectively satisfy wants and needs in the marketplace.
Basically, "hearing the voice of the consumer" means taking the information that they have about what people want and actually putting the preferences of the consumer first.
Answer:
-$20,000 short fall
Explanation:
July:
Total cash available:
= Cash balance + Cash collections
= $12,000 + $67,000
= $79,000
End cash:
= Total cash available - Cash payments
= $79,000 - (33,000 + 12,000)
= $79,000 - $45,000
= $34,000
August:
Total cash available:
= Cash balance + Cash collections
= $34,000 + $33,000
= $67,000
End cash:
= Total cash available - Cash payments
= $67,000 - (34,000 + 20,000 + 33,000)
= $67,000 - $87,000
= -$20,000 (Short fall)
Answer:
quantity demanded; quantity supplied; supply; demand
Explanation:
When there is a change in price of goods, this change will lead to quantity demanded and it will also lead to a change in the quantity supplied. According to the law of demand, an increase in price will lead to a decrease in quantity demanded and vice-versa.
When there is a change in government susidies, this change will lead to a change in supply, and a change in the number of buyers will lead to a change in demand.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
A change in price will lead to a change in quantity demanded and to a change in <em>quantity supplied,</em> while a change in government subsidies will lead to a change in supply and a change in the number of buyers will lead to a change in demand.
Answer:
The answer is "Narrow the range of choices among the variety of pricing strategies".
Explanation:
The marketing director considers target price and limitations to limit the range of pricing strategies among them.
It actively manages the promotion and placement of a brand or even the items and services sold by a firm.
These are typically involved in attracting more customers to the business and boost brand awareness through marketing activities.
Answer:
Of course Jo-Anne Roberts can keep the apartment.
Explanation:
Jo-Anne and the previous owner of the apartment had a valid contract by which Jo-Anne was to pay $3.7 million for the apartment. She has already partially completed her performance on the contract, so the seller must perform his part of the contract.
