1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreyandreev [35.5K]
3 years ago
12

Should people be required to fight in a war? Why or Why not?

History
1 answer:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
5 0
No they shouldn’t be because people should have the choice whether they want to fight in the war. That just would be unfair in my opinion especially because they may not make it out alive so I feel like people should be able to do whatever career they wanna pursue.
You might be interested in
Which U.S. action would be more likely under the Reagan Doctrine than under
Kamila [148]

Answer:

The correct answer is B. Providing weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow a foreign communist government would be more likely under the Reagan Doctrine that under the foreign policy of detente.

Explanation:

The Reagan Doctrine was a Cold War foreign policy doctrine of President Ronald Reagan, by which the United States sought to diminish the international influence of Communists. Although the doctrine was followed for less than a decade, it was at the heart of US foreign policy from the early 1980s until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

In practice, the doctrine meant US assistance to anti-communist guerrilla and resistance movements in countries supported by the Soviet Union in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Its purpose was to reduce the influence of the Soviet Union and to create the conditions for capitalism and democratic governance. For example, support was given to Contra-guerrillas in Nicaragua and Islamist Mujahden-guerrillas in Afghanistan.

4 0
4 years ago
Decide whether each item is a benefit or cost of economic globalization.
emmainna [20.7K]
access to a larger market
This is a benefit of economic globalization since it will open up a wide range of national, regional, and a lot of other markets in which resources, goods, and services as well as information are free-flowing. Every market will therefore have access to the products of various other markets in the whole world.

loss of jobs in developed countries
Economic globalization has led to an improvement in the developing countries. Unfortunately, this had a negative effect on the jobs already available in the developed countries since the decrease of poverty in other developing countries would cause some immigrants to leave their jobs in the developed countries to go back to their homelands, where significant improvement is already seen.

This is therefore a cost of economic globalization.

depletion of natural resources
Economic globalization would encourage markets to produce a lot more compared to the usual situation since they can export their resources to other markets in various places of the world. This would then lead to some markets specializing based on what they have, causing them to utilize their natural resources more frequently. 

Depletion of natural resources is therefore a cost of economic globalization.

increase in production of goods
Because of the free-flowing marketplace of goods and services brought by economic globalization, most markets would see a significant increase in the demand of their products. This will lead them to increase their production to meet that demand. Since they can freely export these goods, increasing the production would yield them more profit than usual, thus this will be a benefit of economic globalization.



4 0
3 years ago
The judicial branch is responsible for which of the following? enacting laws enforcing laws suggesting laws repealing laws
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

enacting laws

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which answer choice lists the events of World War II in correct chronological order?
julia-pushkina [17]

Your answer would be A. The war ended with the Little boy and the Big boy being dropped. The little boy hitting hiroshima and causing more damage.

8 0
3 years ago
How did Europe change after Napoleon was defeated?
scZoUnD [109]
It was a lot smarter in there war techniques
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Did the Proclamation of 1763 affect the colonies positively or negatively?
    9·1 answer
  • Did reforms in the 18th century save these empires or provoke their fall
    5·1 answer
  • Which U.S. and Israeli enemy recently test-fired long-range missiles?
    5·2 answers
  • North Korean leader Kim Jong-un says that his country’s nuclear program is purely for peaceful purposes. Therefore, given Mr. Ki
    6·1 answer
  • Who were the Boers?How did they influence the European presence in South Africa?
    14·1 answer
  • How long does Douglass live with the Aulds?
    5·1 answer
  • El Greco adopted his elongated and encompassing style from the ___________.
    5·2 answers
  • Even after his death, Dr.King continues to challenge americans to make america a better nations. What evidence from the text sup
    10·1 answer
  • Why does the federal government have more power than state government?
    12·2 answers
  • Do you think the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was needed and was it stressful
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!