Answer:
Dahil ang mgq ilang lalaki ay sinasabing ang lalaki pa rin ang mas may kaya mas malakas at mas may alam kaya ang mga babaebnoon ay limitado ang karapatan;oo merong ilang bansa na ginito pa rin ang kanilang sistema.
Answer:
Legal Research Record Summary of problem(s) Design and Dress Limited (DDL) has experienced problems due to the alleged harassment of one of their employees, Susie Baker, by another employee, Stephen Harding which, despite internal investigation, has now lead to a formal police report. Can DDL be held be liable for damages in respect of a possible civil claim for harassment; if so on what legal basis and to what degree. Key words or phrases Harassment Protection from harassment Employer’s liability Vicarious liability Damages/sanctions in harassment cases Obvious sources/areas of law Halsbury’s Laws Practitioner texts Statutes Statutory Instruments Case law Client objective(s) To ascertain whether DDL can be held liable for any damages in respect of civil proceedings concerning the harassment alleged, notwithstanding
Answer:
The profit motive it the answer.
Possible Answer
B.
<em>Not 100% on this on but pretty sur it is B.</em>
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
If the court applies the Stare decisis doctrine, the case will not be dismissed.
Explanation:
The stare decisis doctrine will provide the necessary legal bases for the case to proceed within California. This will happen because there is a legal decision applied throughout the national territory that states that this type of clause, which presents a selection forum, is inexorable. This happens because the AOL clause violated, in fact, a very strong public policy, so the judges are obliged to continue with the case, within the state where the public policy was violated.