Answer:
A : balance sheet only
Explanation:
In the given question, the truck was purchased on credit and the truck is a fixed asset that comes under the balance sheet only because in the income statement, the expenses and revenues are recorded whereas retained earnings records profit which is left to the company.
So, it affects the balance sheet only. As balance sheet records all types of assets and all types of liabilities plus shareholder equity.
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
Answer:
The person with Absolute advantage is the one that produces more of a good than the other.
<em><u>Dina </u></em><em>has an absolute advantage in the production of alfalfa, and </em><em><u>Charles</u></em><em> has an absolute advantage in the production of barley. </em>
The person with Comparative Advantage is the person who produces something at a lower opportunity cost.
Charles Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 12 bushels per acre instead of 6 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 6/12 = 0.5 bushels Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 12/6 = 2 bushels Alfalfa is given up.
Dina Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 15 bushels per acre instead of 5 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 5/15 = 0.33 bushels of Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 15/5 = 3 bushels of Alfalfa is given up.
<em>Charles's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>2</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa, whereas Dina's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>3</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa. Because Charles has </em><em><u>lower</u></em><em> a opportunity cost of producing barley than Dina, </em><em><u>Charlie</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of barley, and </em><em><u>Dina</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of alfalfa.</em>
Answer:
Dreamworld's average accumulated expenditures for 2018 was = $421,750
Explanation:
Dreamworld's average accumulated expenditures for 2018 was
January 1 - December 31, 2018 = $307,000 x 
= $307,000
September 31 - December 31 = $459,000 x 
= $114,750
December 31 - December 31 = $459,000 x 
= $0
Total expenditure = $307,000 + $114,750 + $0
Total expenditure = $421,750
Since, the question is to determine 2018 expenditure, 2019 balance are not necessary.
Answer:
Police power.
Explanation:
This form of power is sternly found in the law of the united states of america. It was been arranged and strongly enforced in the tenth amendment of the constitution. This law is said to be carried out by the higher authorities or state to protect and enforce order within their range for benefit of the environment, people and inhabitants.
And it is generally known that the states/authorities can possibly come all out to enforce this law no matter how hard they seem to come against the individual, provided his/her humans rights are not been tampered.
