Answer:
obedience and punishment driven
Explanation:
Obedience and punishment driven is one of the Kohlberg's six stages of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning. in this stage, the person involved focus on the direct consequences of their actions on themselves. That is, an action is wrong if there are consequences (like punishment) associated with the action. This is the reason why Austin could not hit his sister, because, hitting her would result in his mom spanking him. The spanking would serve as a punishment for hitting his sister. Therefore, this is typical of obedience and punishment. If Austin did not hit his sister, he wont be spanked, but if he did, he would be spanked
The quantity demanded increases
The answer is:
must be from a state whose electoral votes went to the Republican candidate in the preceding Presidential election
must come from a state where a majority of its Congressional members are Republicans
comes from a state that has a Republican governor
The republican national comittee was established in order to help republican candidates conduct their fund raising for the political campaign. In order to be a chairman for this organization, a person need to come from a republican dominated states and had similar principles with the republican party.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
D require all elected officials to belong to the same party I believe
