Answer:
B) The student did not make an error. The actual value is 0.50, which was not rejected.
Explanation:
First the student carried out a study which provided no evidence that the preference for brand A was not 0.5 or 50%, then the marketing company carried out a similar study and showed the same results. Since we are trying to determine if the student's research was well done, we must assume first that the marketing company did their research correctly.
If the student had rejected the claim of the marketing company, then she would have made a type I error (which didn't happen). If the student had wrongly accepted the claim from the marketing company (without any evidence of her own), then she would have made a type II error.
Since both studies provided the same conclusions, then we can assume that the student carried out her study in a proper and correct manner.
It incentivizes employees to contribute by offering an employer match.
Total rev = 3000x400 = 1.2 million - (3000 x 280) 840,000 - 160,000 = 200,000 in net income.
Answer:
A. the present value of the future dividends the company pays.
Explanation:
The net present value (NPV) of a project can be defined as the difference between present value of cash-inflow into a project and that of cash-outflow over a specific period of time. Thus, it is simply the value of all cash-flows for a project with respect to its life span.
The underlying assumption of the dividend discount model is that a stock is worth the present value of the future dividends the company pays.
Generally, all financial assets or securities can be securitized i.e turned into a tradable item that can be used to generate money for a potential investor or the owner of the financial asset.
For example, a mortgage backed security can be used as securitization.
