1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldfiish [28.3K]
3 years ago
13

A=b but b=c and d=e and r=t so what eqUals rtjjsghffsdgsdjfnkahsfksjdsaj

Law
1 answer:
Gekata [30.6K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

You might be interested in
On May 15, 2021 a high court in Accra dealt with three different cases: Case 1: Petra construction company Ltd took the ministry
Verdich [7]

Answer:

Case 1 (Fordjour v. Ahmed case on rent) and Case 3 (Giz Construction v. Ministry of Roads on Nonpayment of project ) are civil cases which entail one party by talking the other party to court over money. Ahmed was taken to court by his landlord Fordjour over rent arrears while Minirtsy of Roads was taken to court for non-payment of project by Giz Construction. Case 2 (GRA v. Melcom over Tax payment) is criminal case as it entails Melcom violating laws stipulated by the government.

3 0
3 years ago
Do juveniles sufficiently understand Miranda warning and be able to waive their constitutional rights to remain silent or speak
patriot [66]

According to data, it is found that juveniles do not sufficiently understand the Miranda warning and find it difficult to exercise their right of remaining silent.

<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>

Juveniles are far more sensitive than adults are. This is the reason what may not mean coercion in the case of an adult may be considered as coercion in the case having a juvenile involved. According to the data obtained from a number of juvenile justice cases, it is clear that the juveniles do not choose to make use of their right to remain silent.

This may be either because they don't properly come to terms with what Miranda rights actually are or they are too vulnerable to the interrogation and can't resist speaking out of fear.

4 0
3 years ago
Is it a violation of the U.S Constitution for a defense attorney to not cross-examine the witness?
jasenka [17]

Answer:

The Sixth Amendment provides that a person accused of a crime has the right to confront a witness against him or her in a criminal action.  This includes the right to be present at the trial (which is guaranteed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 43). As well as the right to cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me on this I would greatly appreciate it
Tanya [424]

Answer:

I can not see that sir?

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What does it mean by you have the right to remain silent
Anna11 [10]
It means be quiet or shut up
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A reversible error is: a. any mistake made in a case. b. one that might have affected the outcome of a case. c. determined durin
    15·1 answer
  • This was a law created in 1887 to regulate railroads to ensure fair rates
    6·1 answer
  • Which aspect of U.S. politics is most closely tied to the concept of indirect
    15·2 answers
  • What check does the u.S. Senate have on the president?
    8·1 answer
  • it is a snowy, icy day. Eric is walking home from school when he spots some friends walking the next block over. Eric begins to
    13·1 answer
  • What are the 6 stages of a Hurricane?​
    14·1 answer
  • Giving away another brainliest!!
    10·2 answers
  • Points<br>.............​
    8·1 answer
  • Who is the father of nation in bangladesh
    9·1 answer
  • For a powerboat to be operated in compliance with the law, in addition to registration number what else is required?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!