1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
15

Is it true or false that the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to try certain cases, in addition to its havi

ng appellate jurisdiction?
Law
1 answer:
victus00 [196]3 years ago
6 0
Yes, I presume it’s True.

Explanation:
I don’t have a lot of experience with these questions although I did some research and found that according to the exact wording of Article III, Section 2, states: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” This I presume means the they did have original jurisdiction? Furthermore, if I think about this logically then, would they not be in charge of certain cases that might be severe or important that they wouldn’t let others know or help in?

I presume the answer is yes although you can choose anything you assume is correct. Btw I hope I helped a bit. Good luck!
You might be interested in
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
why does your website suck because first of all I have failed multiple assignment because of this website never using it again
dybincka [34]

Answer:

you can't always rely on every stranger over the internet to help give you answers, look for trusted and newer sources from articles, reports, or other sources.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
I am going to sue you if it is the last thing I do. Curse you Brainly!!!
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

Um okay

Explanation:

Thank you lol

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the 2011 Arab Spring movement, the country of Bahrain stifled the voices of its protesters – restricting where they could
Alex787 [66]
I’m new here, but from ur question i think the answers are freedom of expression/speech and the right to peaceable protest
3 0
3 years ago
The distance it takes you to stop your vehicle depends on: road condition, but not your speed. the number of vehicles in front o
masha68 [24]

Answer:

vehicle condition

Explanation:

if the brakes on a car are all messed up it'll make stopping alot harder.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Do you like bnha????????????????????
    12·2 answers
  • 1. Why is a different type of courage required to save lives?
    5·1 answer
  • Which executive department do you think is the most important and why?
    13·1 answer
  • Discuss why the prison environment is not typically ideal for treatment programs and give examples of ideal environments.
    10·1 answer
  • Pleaseee drop xbox gamertags for an inv to a party rn !!
    14·2 answers
  • Communication is not protected if unpatriotic, defiant, or disrespectful.<br> True or false
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these may not be protected under the attorney-client privilege?
    14·1 answer
  • can someone please tell me one law that can be Breck and you will not go to jail A there are no law like that B .......... C I t
    11·1 answer
  • The bread soaks up the juices and flavours .​
    6·2 answers
  • write a paragraph on your opinion of the correctional system. Do you feel it should be altered or changed?​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!