1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
15

Is it true or false that the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to try certain cases, in addition to its havi

ng appellate jurisdiction?
Law
1 answer:
victus00 [196]3 years ago
6 0
Yes, I presume it’s True.

Explanation:
I don’t have a lot of experience with these questions although I did some research and found that according to the exact wording of Article III, Section 2, states: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” This I presume means the they did have original jurisdiction? Furthermore, if I think about this logically then, would they not be in charge of certain cases that might be severe or important that they wouldn’t let others know or help in?

I presume the answer is yes although you can choose anything you assume is correct. Btw I hope I helped a bit. Good luck!
You might be interested in
What is blue spelled backwards
astra-53 [7]

the answer is Eulb. that is blue spelled backwards

7 0
2 years ago
when we don't understand each other's language, language identity, and culture we view each other differently ?​
Delvig [45]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently

8 0
3 years ago
If the activities of private security personnel are still subject to the law, then what is the reason for abuse in many private
Firdavs [7]

Answer: A mix of local, state regulations, and common law, vary from state to state.

Explanation: Edge

6 0
3 years ago
Is it illegal for a 24 year old to date a 39 year old?
Mademuasel [1]

Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.

Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.

7 0
3 years ago
1.- ¿Qué es la libertad?
Roman55 [17]
I’m going back to sleep in the next few days so I’m going back in a bit and get some sleep njjjjjjjj
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the burden of proof in a criminal case?
    12·1 answer
  • Breaking a contract is a violation of which type of law?
    13·1 answer
  • Gidgits Galore supplies gidgits to a large retailer who decides to do an Out-of-Court Workout with its creditors in order to con
    11·2 answers
  • 100 point give away <br> have a good day/night wherever you are
    13·2 answers
  • Reporters have a responsibility both to inform the public and to protect their sources. From an ethical standpoint what should J
    10·1 answer
  • Sup guys do yaa need help
    14·2 answers
  • How much does a Honey mustard rotisserie cost from subway (6 inch)?
    14·2 answers
  • if my 504 covers what I did(walked out of a situation to calm down and to control myself) and my principal pressed unruly charge
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Explain what a criminal case is. 2. Explain what a civil case is. 3. As the judge, what is your job in a civil case?
    15·1 answer
  • What two safe driving skills a driver should use when driving in a raining road condition
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!