Lol there arent any choicess?? hahaha lol
I have searched for more details online regarding the question:
John, who is a chronic alcoholic, is currently in Stage V of renal failure and has received a call that a donor match has been found for his kidney transplant. Based on the fact that John has destroyed his kidney due to his chronic <span>alcoholism, should he be eligible for a kidney transplant? Why or why not?
John needs a kidney transplant as chronic kidney disease only progresses and since he is in the end-stage renal disease, his current diseased kidneys will not do a great job in clearing nitrogenous wastes in the body eventually leading to uremia. As for eligibility is concerned, if John's chronic alcoholism is still active then he is not eligible for kidney transplantation. However, if John has abstained from alcohol intake for 6 months and above, then he is eligible for kidney transplant provided that he has no other contraindications such as active malignancy or severe cardiac failure.</span>
Most patient are concern about the doctors’
reliability upon knowing the difference between a MD and DO. It may cause
confusion between doctor of medicine (MD) and doctors of osteopathic medicine (DO) in terms
of giving the most appropriate treatment because the approach in the treatment
is different in both practice.
Answer:
emotional reactions
per-conceived assumptions
resistance to change or to learning new things
stereotypes
The excerpt is from Of Plymouth Plantation, the journal by William Bradford who was the governor of Plymouth Colony in 17th century. It is the description of Bradford's account on the Indians named Squanto and Samoset and how they helped the Pilgrims to negotiate with Indian tribe chief. The excerpt shows that the Europeans were strangers for the Indians until the writing recalls the story of two aforementioned characters. They didn't understand the Europeans first and they were somehow trying to be careful. Therefore, the correct options are guarded and wary.
