Answer:
Explanation:
IRB system is an acronym and it stands for Institutional review Board
The institutional review Board is a body of minimum of five members and they are being established as a body or say a committee which is for the regulation and also saddled with the responsibility of reviewing activities related to how research are being done. The institutional review Board are also set up to protect and approve researches being done in a particular subject.
Answer: Well, Im not in law school or college but Criminology is just like Psycology. Take a first-time killer for example, which after each murder (strangulation for example) puts the Lucifer pentagram on the body of each victim. The way the person was killed is the MMO. Motives, Means, and Opportunity. the way they killed the person, that will be their 'signature'. If a new victim comes up with the same signature and mmo, that will rank the murderer a serial killer. many people kill because they dislike the person, or are mentally ill. in the line of duty like fbi and homicide detective, they always try to understand exactly why the person did this. was it revenge? robbery gone wrong? copycat serial killer? (copycating is where you take a serial killer from the past and recreate their signature and mmo. if that serial killer isnt already dead or in prison, it might be thought that person has come back). all of this comes down to one word:
<h2>
profiling </h2>
since criminology is just the basic study of criminals and people and to why they do things, it will always be used in law enforcement and first responders.
i hope this helped!
Answer: First, courts will examine the statutory authority for an agency's action and will invalidate agency choices that exceed these limits. In addition, a court may examine an agency's discretionary decisions, or discrete actions with legal consequences for the public.
Answer:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Explanation:
The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.
In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.
Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
