Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Resilience. A good correctional officer should learn from their mistakes and use those lessons to get better at what they do. ...
Communication skills. ...
Open-mindedness. ...
Stress management skills. ...
Self-discipline. ...
Analytical skills. ...
Teamwork. ...
Problem-solving skills.
Answer:
Explanation:
Crimes are basically acts that are defiant/transgression of laws that if violated the person or people who acted can be punished.
This rebus is supposed to mean “nobody is over the law”, since the word “nobody” is depicted over the word “law”. This reigns true in the government, since the law sets guidelines for all citizens, with no exceptions.
