It would be more logical to have an abundant amount of resources than to be in a center of a training route. Thomas Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807 is an example. America suffered more even though it was meant to punish France and Great Britain. If America had more supplies then they wouldn't have any issue with trading with someone else. America is across the sea so it is hard to believe they were in the center of the training route.
Having a good location is important, but if there isn't enough to trade then that creates more issues. One would be that the area could become a reputation for being unreliable. It does come to the question if the loads of resources is worth traveling for or to take a route that's faster but there isn't a lot of give. Being isolated also means that of there happens to be an issue in the trade then the location is either off the maps or people don't want to there because of the distance and the prices might be able to go up. That's why resources are better than location.
An Oasis because a gravel-covered plain would hurt there feet.A salted crusted flat is dangers if one little piece of water touches the salt could ruin the whole area.A rocky plateau they would have have to climb up and down the plateau and they could get hurt.A Oasis has pure water,and enough trees to keep most or all the air pure, and almost to no dangers animals
Can you please include the following arguments? Thanks!
Answer:
equal rights
Explanation: if women and children (mostly women) had equal rights in all parts of the world they would be protected as they would be seen as a equal and not be belittled.
The pattern of associations among items of information within one’s memory is referred to as MEMORY STRUCTURE.
