The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Based on the Judicial Branch the court case that stands out to me the most is Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
For me, this is one of the most important cases in the history of the United States.
The case was decided on May 17, 1954. The Supreme Court decided that state laws in the US public school system that kept racial segregation were unconstitutional.
This was a major advancement in the country regarding the shameful subject of racism. After the US Supreme Court decision, racial segregation in public schools of America ended, at least in theory and by judicial mandate.
Because they believed in Christianity which the nazi party did not agree with
<span>The answer is intestacy.
it means that when a person dies and has property that is worth more
than the total of their obligatory debts and funeral costs, with making a legal
will or any compulsory declaration. This can also apply to situations where
there is a will but is only applicable to a part of the estate while the rest
of the estate becomes the intestate estate. Intestacy law also known as the law
of descent and distribution decides who is eligible for the property from the estate
under inheritance rules.</span>
Answer:
The Meakambut finds shelter in many different ways but the most popular is in bush camps, rock shelters, and caves. Now, the way they satisfy their needs is by collecting, hunting, and distributing these tasks among them in a very well organized duty system.
Explanation:
Meakambut is one of the last nomad cultures in the modern world. However, they are the smallest group and the one that is less developed or that still chooses to stay away from modern technology. They live in different locations throughout the year. Changing their refugee for the season and the resources available in the zone of their refugee. They have a very well structured society that relays on team-work and discipline. Thus, they share the tasks and pursue them with all their responsibility.
It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
