<span>1. nitrogen
</span>a biogeochemical cycle that cycles material by fixation, assimilation, ammonification, nitrification, denitrification, and the food chain <span>
2. phosphorus
</span>a biogeochemical cycle that cycles material by weathering, erosion, tectonic activity, and the food chain
<span>
3. tectonic
</span>a geochemical cycle that cycles material by mantle convection, subduction, and seafloor spreading <span>
4. carbon
</span>a biogeochemical cycle that cycles material by photosynthesis, respiration, and the food chain <span>
5. hydrologic
</span>a biogeochemical cycle that cycles material by evaporation, condensation, precipitation, and transpiration <span>
6. rock
</span>a geochemical cycle that cycles material by weathering, erosion, deposition, cementation, and metamorphism
Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Answer:
i would say oil production
DONT COME AT ME IM NOT SMART ;(
In the real world, they already making policy and spending decisions based on economic development.
If they spent money and made policy based on the general well-being of the people it would be spent much differently. No money would be going to foreign aid, CRT, etc. Less money would go to the military, politicians, dangerous science experiments, etc. More money would go towards real infrastructure like roads, rails, waterways, border security, and so on. Finally, policy decisions wouldn't isolate the public and instead, it would be to the benefit of the lower class.
