The line given above that reveals a dramatic irony is that "The responsible party is a god." It could not be a woman because it is describing death nor it is not dead yet. It clearly says that death itself is a god and no one has ever felt that they could love death even if most of them wanted to die.
Summary:
The lifestyle radicals of the '60s saw themselves as heirs to this American tradition of self-expression; today, it energizes the Tea Party movement, marching to defend individual liberty from the smothering grasp of European-style collectivism. And when it comes to questions about how much the respondents value the individual against the collective that is, how much they give priority to individual interest over the demand of groups, or personal conscience over the orders of authority Americans consistently answer in a way that favors the group over the individual. In fact, we are more likely to favor the group than Europeans are. Surprising as it may sound, Americans are much more likely than Europeans to say that employees should follow a boss's orders even if the boss is wrong; to say that children "must" love their parents; and to believe that parents have a duty to sacrifice themselves for their children. Though Americans do score high on a couple of aspects of individualism, especially where it concerns government intervening in the market, in general, we are likelier than Europeans to believe that individuals should go along and get along.
Answer:
An emphasis on nutrition would be important in this society.
Explanation:
The author of the above text shows how health and nature must play an important role in the lives of all members of society. This is because health and nature are directly linked to people's nutrition, which is neglected very easily to the detriment of matters of less importance, since nutrition is what gives an individual the chance to pursue their goals with this, we can claim that this is the central idea of the sentence.
I believe it is C - metaphor. In the first sentence, if you were to put your name there, it would simply describe you as a dignitary.
This is a personal question. You need to say what YOU do the most, and it cannot really be proven by facts, unless you record how much you read on Ebooks and how many paper books you read. I personally read Ebooks more often.
gud luk fren xxx
