Flagpole sitting is the cprrect answer
Answer:
1. The passing on of physical or mental characteristics genetically from one generation to another.
2. the study of heredity and the variation of inherited characteristics.
3. Genetic material, also known as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA), plays a fundamental role in the composition of living organisms.
4. DNA is called the blueprint of life because it contains the instructions needed for an organism to grow, develop, survive and reproduce. ... Proteins do most of the work in cells, and are the basic unit of structure and function in the cells of organisms.
5. The set of genes that an offspring inherits from both parents, a combination of the genetic material of each, is called the organism's genotype. The genotype is contrasted to the phenotype, which is the organism's outward appearance and the developmental outcome of its genes.
6. Inherited trait: Trait received by offspring from parent. Both physical or behavioral characteristics can be inherited. Acquired trait: Behaviors or that are learned or acquired through interaction with environment and life experiences.
7. Sexual reproduction is the union of male and female gametes to form a fertilized egg, or zygote. The resulting offspring inherit one half of their traits from each parent. Consequently they are not genetically identical to either parent or siblings, except in the case of identical twins.
8. Through his careful breeding of garden peas, Gregor Mendel discovered the basic principles of heredity and laid the mathematical foundation of the science of genetics.
Answer:
An ambiguous, controversial concept, Jacksonian Democracy in the strictest sense refers simply to the ascendancy of Andrew Jackson and the Democratic party after 1828. More loosely, it alludes to the entire range of democratic reforms that proceeded alongside the Jacksonians’ triumph—from expanding the suffrage to restructuring federal institutions. From another angle, however, Jacksonianism appears as a political impulse tied to slavery, the subjugation of Native Americans, and the celebration of white supremacy—so much so that some scholars have dismissed the phrase “Jacksonian Democracy” as a contradiction in terms.
Such tendentious revisionism may provide a useful corrective to older enthusiastic assessments, but it fails to capture a larger historical tragedy: Jacksonian Democracy was an authentic democratic movement, dedicated to powerful, at times radical, egalitarian ideals—but mainly for white men.
Socially and intellectually, the Jacksonian movement represented not the insurgency of a specific class or region but a diverse, sometimes testy national coalition. Its origins stretch back to the democratic stirrings of the American Revolution, the Antifederalists of the 1780s and 1790s, and the Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans. More directly, it arose out of the profound social and economic changes of the early nineteenth century.
Recent historians have analyzed these changes in terms of a market revolution. In the Northeast and Old Northwest, rapid transportation improvements and immigration hastened the collapse of an older yeoman and artisan economy and its replacement by cash-crop agriculture and capitalist manufacturing. In the South, the cotton boom revived a flagging plantation slave economy, which spread to occupy the best lands of the region. In the West, the seizure of lands from Native Americans and mixed-blood Hispanics opened up fresh areas for white settlement and cultivation—and for speculation.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is very doubtful the same solution could have worked.
Explanation:
The United States was born as a federation of the 13 former British colonies, which, after years of debate, finally settled for a federal pact, creating a central government and states that had considerable power over their territories, as a means of balancing the power between states and the federal government. But in the end, regional identities aside, all states saw themselves as American states and the federal government as an American institution. However, in Great Britain, history had been different. The US has states, but the United Kingdom has nations. Many people from these nations of the British Islands, especially from Scotland and Ireland, saw the English as invaders, and the British government as an institution that represented the will and the interests of the English. A common British identity never fully developed in the same sense as the American one, and the same solution probably couldn't have worked in both countries. Eventually some powers were devolved to national legislatures in the United Kingdom, but legally, they're still subordinated to the British central government.
Answer:
Military/oligarchy
Explanation:
the city-state of Sparta developed a militaristic society ruled by two kings and an oligarchy which is a small group of people ruling, or a small group that exercised political control like South Africa is under apartheid, for example. I hope this helps you!!!
