This sounds like a great question to answer about the reliability of Nick as a narrator. On one hand, he seems to be a very honest character. But, on the other hand, he will always have an innate bias based on his feeling towards certain characters and events.
Answer:
Alex knew he had to keep walking if he wanted to find the treasure so he kept looking for it, following the clues, for days and days, until then a bunch of weird guys came, but they were different. Their clothes, the way they talk are different, and it appears that they are also searching for the treasure so that they can bring back the treasure of their family, unlike Alex he wanted it for himself so that he could prove to them that he is great and can discover the hidden treasure. They wanted to murder him at first, but the group's leader refused because he wanted to help, and after one night of working together, they discovered the treasure, of which Alex carried some to town. And received a certificate for discovering the secret treasure, becoming extremely well-known. So he proved them wrong by doing what he wanted, and the weird group bought back the family treasure.
I believe that Eurycleia doesn't want Telemachus to leave because she doesn't want to leave the palace unprotected.
She believes that if he leaves, the suitors will try to plunder the palace and steal everything, and there will be no one to protect either the palace, or Penelope.
Answer:
B. So warm and so light
Explanation:
A. Daffodils,
B. So yellow and bright!
C. you shine in the garden
B. - So warm and so light
So far it looks like an A/B/C, poem
So B. would be the correct answer
(as it's the only one that rhymes)
The sentence that can be removed <u>without affecting the explanation</u> is "<em>In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity</em>."
The reason this sentence can be removed is that it does not offer any necessary information to the explanation. The passage is about how technology leads to bigger cities. This information is conveyed just as efficiently without the need for the first sentence.
Rather than serving to offer information, the first sentence in the passage serves as a sort of <u>introduction</u> to the text. The very next sentence can just as easily serve as an intro to the passage while providing context for the development of early technology that led to the industrial revolution.
For these reasons, the sentence "<em>In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity</em>." can easily be removed from the passage <u>without affecting</u> the explanation.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/816588?referrer=searchResults
