Because <span>Some resources are better suited for use in making the first product.
In order to shift to other product, we need to sacrifice a certain amount of benefit that came from producing that product.
For example, when we decided to shift from using oil energy into solar energy, we had to sacrifice the low cost , the efficiency, and the current reserves of oil product and gaining the ability to preserve the environment.</span>
The Articles of Confederation was the first attempt at an American government.
Among other things, an unbelievable inflation hit Europe during that period.
It was caused by what the Spanish empire did. It brought back huge amount of which
initiated the value of gold to plummet. Europe has never been in this situation
and it was incomprehensible to They thought more gold is better, but suddenly
prices started to increase bizarrely. There was also very few silver
being produced at the time, hence pirate attacks became very rampant.
A large part of the continent was torn apart by conflicts both domestic
and international between varying religions like Protestants and Catholics.
There was the Dutch revolution between 1568 and 1648, the French Wars of
Religion which lasted 36 years from 1562 to 1598, the Thirty Years War in 1618
through 1648, and the Spanish Armada Expedition, to name a few.
Another problem was in the East, the threat Ottoman Yurkey which posed
to Europe.
<span>There was also population decline, plague,
economic warfare, and famine. </span>
Japan
Japan controlled Japan
Answer:
The correct answer is C) Schenck v. the United States (1919)
Explanation:
The Schenck v. the United States (1919) case has great importance in the history of the country. Two activists, Elizabeth Baer and Charles Schenck were writing against the military draft.
They even distributed pamphlets discouraging people from joining the military and promoted a rebellion against forceful draft.
They were charged under the Espionage Act of 1917. In their defense, they stated how they were only practicing their right to free speech.
However, the Judge did not rule in their favour stating that a free speech is not protected under the first Amendment if it creates a 'clear and present danger'
