When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law, it prepared the path for desegregation in the workplace and public services, as well as enhancing King's profile and removing Connor from his position. This is further explained below.
<h3>What are protest campaigns in Birmingham?</h3>
Generally, The local campaign's objective was to undermine Birmingham's system of segregation by exerting pressure on local business owners during Easter, the second-biggest shopping season of the year.
In conclusion, It improved King's standing, drove Connor out of his position, forced integration in Birmingham, and opened the path for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed racial discrimination in employment and public accommodations throughout the country.
Read more about protest campaigns in Birmingham
brainly.com/question/15432764
#SPJ1
The middles colonies had rich farmland and a moderate climate. This made it a more suitable place to grow grain and livestock than New England. Their environment was ideal for small to large farms. The coastal lowland and bays provided harbors, thus the middle colonies were able to provide trading opportunities where the three regions meet in market towns and cities. The Southern colonies had fertile farmlands which contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo.
The New England colonies had very long and cold winter, making it hard for crops to be grown. The soil was pretty rocky and unfertile, so not too many plants were grown. Most farms in New England were small family farms. The middle colonies were called the breadbasket states, because of how much wheat and barley were grown. The southern colonies grew many things. The Southern Colonies were able to grow crops, fruits, and vegetables because of their fertile soil, and warm climate.
They must say that cash crops were grown in the middle colonies, that slaves were used on large plantations in the south, and that there was subsistence farming in New England.
Answer:
:
Historians such as Edmund Morgan say this evidence suggests that racial attitudes were much more flexible in early 17th-century Virginia than they would later become. A 1625 census recorded 23 Africans in Virginia. In 1649 there were 300, and in 1690 there were 950.
