1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
15

What is the strongest dynasty and why.

History
2 answers:
Rus_ich [418]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Charles I of England and his son, the future James II of England, from the House of Stuart.

Explanation:

Charles I of England and his son, the future James II of England, from the House of Stuart. The Qing dynasty was the final imperial dynasty of China, established in 1636 and ended in 1912, with a brief restoration in 1917. A dynasty (UK: /ˈdɪnəsti/, US: /ˈdaɪnəsti/) is a sequence of rulers from the same family,[1] usually in the context of a feudal or monarchical system, but sometimes also appearing in elective republics. Alternative terms for "dynasty" may include "house", "family" and "clan", among others. The longest-surviving dynasty in the world is the Imperial House of Japan, otherwise known as the Yamato dynasty, whose reign is traditionally dated to 660 BC. The dynastic family or lineage may be known as a "noble house",[2] which may be styled as "imperial", "royal", "princely", "ducal", "comital", "baronial" etc., depending upon the chief or present title borne by its members. Historians periodize the histories of many nations and civilizations, such as Ancient Egypt (3100–30 BC) and Imperial China (221 BC–AD 1912), using a framework of successive dynasties. As such, the term "dynasty" may be used to delimit the era during which a family reigned, and also to describe events, trends and artifacts of that period (e.g., "a Ming-dynasty vase"). The word "dynasty" itself is often dropped from such adjectival references (e.g., "a Ming vase"). Until the 19th century, it was taken for granted that a legitimate function of a monarch was to aggrandize his dynasty: that is, to expand the wealth and power of his family members.[3] Prior to the 20th century, dynasties throughout the world have traditionally been reckoned patrilineally, such as under the Frankish Salic law. In nations where it was permitted, succession through a daughter usually established a new dynasty in her husband's ruling house. This has changed in some places in Europe, where succession law and convention have maintained dynasties de jure through a female. For instance, the House of Windsor will be maintained through the children of Queen Elizabeth II, as it did with the monarchy of the Netherlands, whose dynasty remained the House of Orange-Nassau through three successive queens regnant. The earliest such example among major European monarchies was in the Russian Empire in the 18th century, where the name of the House of Romanov was maintained through Grand Duchess Anna Petrovna. This also happened in the case of Queen Maria II of Portugal, who married Prince Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but whose descendants remained members of the House of Braganza, per Portuguese law. In Limpopo Province of South Africa, Balobedu determined descent matrilineally, while rulers have at other times adopted the name of their mother's dynasty when coming into her inheritance. Less frequently, a monarchy has alternated or been rotated, in a multi-dynastic (or polydynastic) system—that is, the most senior living members of parallel dynasties, at any point in time, constitute the line of succession. Not all feudal states or monarchies were or are ruled by dynasties; modern examples are the Vatican City State, the Principality of Andorra, and the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta. Throughout history, there were monarchs that did not belong to any dynasty; non-dynastic rulers include King Arioald of the Lombards and Emperor Phocas of the Byzantine Empire. Dynasties ruling subnational monarchies do not possess sovereign rights; two modern examples are the monarchies of Malaysia and the royal families of the United Arab Emirates. The word "dynasty" is sometimes used informally for people who are not rulers but are, for example, members of a family with influence and power in other areas, such as a series of successive owners of a major company. It is also extended to unrelated people, such as major poets of the same school or various rosters of a single sports team.

Lyrx [107]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: look it up its ez

Explanation:

and it will tell u everything hope this helped

You might be interested in
Was Columbus really a conqueror? was he the bad guy? explain your reasoning 5 sentences​
Degger [83]

Answer:

1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer.  3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.

5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.

Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.

Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.

brainliest plz

8 0
3 years ago
The ________ movement began in the 1920s with the purpose of restraining the sale and use of alcohol.
Arte-miy333 [17]
Temperance

The temperance movement began in the 1920s with the purpose of restraining the sale and use of alcohol. this actually took many people to create and develop some forms of black market and hidden club in order to avoid the limitation or moving altogether in a place where the limitation did not exist in the first place.
8 0
3 years ago
Which was one way that everyday life changed during the first half of the 19th century
wolverine [178]

Answer:

canals were built primarily in the north

8 0
4 years ago
Take a look at the following letter written by Abraham Lincoln. What indicates that it is a primary source?
Serggg [28]

Answer:

The letter is dated.

It is a handwritten document.

The letter looks old.

Abraham Lincoln was the president in 1854.

Explanation:

I read a document and thats  what it said

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Lafayette decide to fight in the American Revolution?
dezoksy [38]

1. During his commission with the Continental Army, he became a close confidant and long-time friend of George Washington. In 1779, Lafayette was granted leave from the Continental Army to return to France. His goal was to secure additional aid from the king to help the American colonists fight the British.

2 referring to An Improbable French Leader in America.

lafayette was born as the child of French Nobles and has been lived in luxury ever since he's born.

If he join the American cause, he will discredit his family which benefits the most from the structure that currently imposed by the French government.

The Marquis de Lafayette was an improbable leader in the American Revolutionary War. ... And yet, despite his wealth and high standing in French aristocracy, Lafayette was not content. During a stay in Paris, he learned of the American colonists' revolt against the British.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was NOT a major factor in the decision to use the atomic bomb?
    5·2 answers
  • The Battle of New Orleans brought great fame to Andrew Jackson.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    6·1 answer
  • McCarthyism is a term used for the accusations of any ______ activities in the US.
    6·1 answer
  • world war 1 left Germany feeling? a.unfairly punished, b.eager to make friends, c.content with the peace treaties, d.good in the
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following disagreements was the root cause of the Iconoclast Controversy of the eighth and ninth centuries?
    12·2 answers
  • How are you today everyone?
    10·2 answers
  • In your local newspaper, you read an editorial supporting a local building initiative that will cost the town millions of dollar
    14·1 answer
  • What was the New Deal? Name two New Deal programs and explain their purpose. What programs are still relevant/important today?
    12·2 answers
  • Write a brief statement about the importance of the Egyptian Civilization
    11·1 answer
  • What was the effect after the Zealots rebelled against Roman rule?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!