The correct answer is 2. The purpose of Mohandas Gandhi's actions such as the Salt March and the textile boycott was to draw attention to critical issues in India.
From 1919, Ghandi openly belonged to the front of the Indian nationalist movement. He established new methods of social struggle, such as the hunger strike, and in his programs he rejected armed struggle and carried out a preaching of the ahimsa (nonviolence) as a means to resist British rule and to reveal the abuses and problems of colonialism in his country.
Answer:
The riots began on June 3, 1943, after a group of sailors stated that they had been attacked by a group of Mexican American zoot-suiters. ... In response to these confrontations, police arrested hundreds of Mexican American youths, many of whom had already been attacked by servicemen.
Answer:
B). Build a new school.
Explanation:
Municipal bonds are characterized as the debt security that the governments(state or local) issue to raise finance(by selling these bonds in the market) and back their expenditure.
As per the question, the best example of reason for raising bond money by local governments would be to 'build a new school' as the construction projects are one of the prominent public work projects for which governments raises fund from the investors(by selling bonds to them) that backs their spending. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
During the Progressive Era, political leaders instituted policies designed to empower average Americans and curtail the power of large business interests. In the course of US history, the pendulum has swung between increasing government regulation of big business and leaving it free to grow as it will. In your lifetime, what decisions has the government made about increasing or decreasing this type of regulation? What have been the effects of those decisions? Compare the issues and outcomes to those of the early twentieth century decisions to regulate big business in the Progressive Era. You might also consider whether the media serve a similar "muckraking" role in causing this pendulum to swing one way or another
There are more people who are governed than who does the government. Governing with people's liberties is what makes the country thrive along with its economy and the conditions of the civilians livelihood. Additionally, impeding upon your publics rights for the sake of securing a kind of tyrranical rule over people, will always result in an overthrowing by the public.
