The way that Lincoln and Douglas view, disagreement and
facts about slavery is that Lincoln views them that they don’t have the ability
to accept or cope up with the moral standards which was opposite of Douglas
thinks. He also views them that they are also avaricious which Douglas didn't
thought of. While Douglas in the other hand, has the belief that the people’s
choice and having the thought of people who are slaves can back down the
movement of the system of labor.
<span />
Answer:
The Farmers’ Alliances were not successful in influencing national farm policy in favor of farmers and needed to form a national political party as a result.
Explanation:
The Farmers’ Alliances were formed in 1875. in hopes to improve the economic conditions of agrarian workers.
The movement was made out of a few separate organizations -
- whites on the South had the National Farmers' Alliance and Industrial Union
- in the Midwest, there was the National Farmers' Alliance for both white and black farmers
- African Americans on the South had their own Colored Farmers' National Alliance and Cooperative Union
As the economic movement, this Alliance didn't have much success. It wasn't united or influential and didn't have much of a political impact.
<u>That is why, finally, Alliance decided to turn into the political movement with its own political candidate. In the early 1890s, Alliance formed the Populist (People's) Party which fought for the ideas of the Alliance, but with the political background and force. </u>
When he first became President, the conflict with Japan was
still continuing. After the war finished there was trouble in Korea which
became an impasse after China move toward in to help North Korea. Obliteration
of Europe and Asia that required to be reconstructed. The Russians declined to pull
out their troops from Germany and Eastern Europe and remained in Estonia, Latvia,
and Lithuania. There were severe labor difficulties in the US Steel industry.
The US had to readapt to a peace-time economy and recuperate from the enormous
costs of WW II.
IRON WAS CHEAPIER SO CITIZENS COULD AFFORD IT!
