Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The overjustification effect is a term in psychology that is described as an act when used diminishes intrinsic motivation; this effect takes place when a reward (introduction of an extrinsic reward ) is been attached as a motivator of behavior, as a result, decreases the intrinsic motivation (behavior that is driven by internal rewards) to do something. Incentive such as money, gift, praise etc are introduced after a behavior can lead to lower, rather than higher motivation to perform a task
According to the overjustification effect, reinforcements that praise people tend to increase intrinsic motivation, and reinforcement that seeks to control people decrease intrinsic motivation.
Answer:
c. customer requirements to a product's overall technical requirements
Explanation:
The House of Quality is a part of a large process called QFD (Quality, Function, Deployment). This process, focuses on representing quality-monitoring, focusing on the function execution of a plan, and finally, reviews and follows the application of resources for deployment of the plan that has already been established. In other words, House of Quality, refers to a process for product development, in which it specializes in the customer desires for product or process development, and, it combines all the capabilities and resources of an organization to meet those desires.
Answer: Angela loses because she had entered into a 'personal satisfaction contract' with Franklin which clearly mentioned the clause which said that Angela would be paid only if the painting is acceptable in Franklin's sole judgment.
Explanation: A personal satisfaction contract legalizes the right of the receiving party of not paying the giving party on the grounds of dissatisfaction over the work or service dispensed by the latter. In the given case, Angela had agreed to the clause which mentioned that she would only be paid if her work satisfies Franklin's expectation from her work. On the grounds of dissatisfaction, Franklin rejects to pay her and she also loses the lawsuit filed against Franklin.
Answer: Steve is experiencing evaluation apprehension
Explanation: Since Steve was playing for his high school team for the first time, he knew that others would be watching and evaluating his game, and among those watching him were coaches, therefore, on whom his future playing on the team depends. Based on the coach's judgement, it depends on whether Steve will play the next game, etc., which means a reward / penalty concept based on what others think of Steve. This means that during the game, Steve has been thinking about what others think of him that causes arousal, and that arousal can improve or diminish our work, in Steve's case was that this excitement diminished his performance in the match.
It means that when we work in the presence of others who are watching over us, we think like Steve, what do they think about our work and that can improve or diminish our performance, so we have experienced <em>evaluation apprehension.</em>