Answer:
One reason is that there was too much pressure in the bottom of the ocean, from all the water pressing together.
hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Hydrologists are most likely to perform actions relating to estimating the amount of groundwater in an aquifer.
<h3>Hydrologists</h3>
Hydrologists are scientists that specialize in the study of how water relates to the various crusts of the earth.
Hydrology in itself refers to the branch of science that studies how water moves relative to the earth's crusts.
Thus, species identification, age of fossils, or extracting underground oils have nothing to do with the work of hydrologists.
More on hydrology can be found here: brainly.com/question/13554728
Ion transport or active transport depending on which situation you have.
The answer is the last one. Countercurrent multiplication in the kidneys is the way toward utilizing vitality to create an osmotic slope that empowers you to reabsorb water from the tubular liquid and deliver concentrated pee. It is discovered broadly in nature and particularly in mammalian organs.
Countercurrent multiplication was initially considered as a system whereby pee is gathered in the nephron. At first, concentrated in the 1950s by Gottschalk and Mylle following Werner Kuhn's hypotheses, this instrument picked up notoriety simply after a progression of confounded micropuncture tests.
Answer:
What would be the expected result of the experiment?
For the drawing of the map part, the scientific will find that effectively, a very large number of volcanoes are located near the meeting points of tectonic plates. The volcanoes that aren't now at the edge of the plate were most probably at the moment of their formation, and were moved away by the movement of the plate.
But I doubt the scientist would be able to identify many new volcanoes, because the creation of a volcano isn't something happening overnight.
How would you interpret the results if the scientist observes no new volcanic activity?
I would say that does NOT invalidate the theory because the observation period is extremely short. 10 years is an insignificant amount of time geologically speaking... the study would have to be conducted over at least 1,000 years to maybe have some results at all. Just imagine how many volcanoes there would be if a new one was created every 10 years along the side of a tectonic plate.
