Answer:
Options Include:
<em>A) Server-side validation
</em>
<em>B) Client-side validation
</em>
<em>C) Validate in trust
</em>
D) Client-side and server-side validation
<em>Client-side and server-side validation is Correct</em>
Explanation:
The best option is to validate the client side with the server side. Using these together would provide the best testing option for Sharon.
<em>This keeps user feedback instantly without wasting postbacks while also protecting against JavaScript disabled users. That's how the validation controls for ASP.NET operate. </em>
This is definitely not over-engineering as there are risks of using one without the other.
Individual validation on the server side and individual validation on the client side are both incorrect. Trust validation is not a form of validation.
A. IT professional, who maintains the network, must be added and removed from the network. - risk
B. Clients work independently; therefore, if one computer is not working, other computers can still do their jobs. - benefit (scalability is always a benefit)
C. Security levels are set up by individuals; therefore, these networks may not be as secure. - risk
D. There is no need for a big IT department to keep the network up and running. - benefit (it is simple for maintenance)
B-Robotic surgery allows surgeons to make smaller incisions.
Explaination: Anything having to do with medical procedures are healthcare so this is my reasoning.
