Answer: $66.90 per unit
Explanation:
Cost that would be avoided is:
= Direct materials + Direct cost + Variable manufacturing overhead + part of fixed manufacturing overhead
= 20.80 + 26.50 + 6.90 + (36.10 - 31.40)
= $58.90
If the outside supplier commits to 59,000 units a year, the company should not pay more than:
= (Number of units supplied * Avoidable cost + contribution margin on other product (opportunity cost) ) / Number of units supplied
= (59,000 * 58.90 + 472,000) / 59,000
= $66.90 per unit
Answer:
The total equivalent units for direct materials for October is 4,200
Explanation:
The Concept of Equivalent Units measures the number of units completed in terms of input element introduced in the process.
The Equivalent Units are Calculated on the units ending that is on the Units Completed and Units of Closing Work in Process
Note that materials are added at the beginning of the process
<u>Units Completed</u>
Are 100% complete in terms of Raw Materials
Equivalent units = 3900 × 100 % = 3900
<u>Units of Closing Work in Process</u>
Are 100% complete in terms of Raw Materials
Equivalent units = 30 × 100 % = 300
Total Equivalent Units = 3900+300 = 4,200
Answer:
equivalent annual cost: 19,784.81
The investment is not economically justified as it is cheaper to pay the fines than invest in the equipment to avoid them.
Explanation:
We calcualte the PMT of a 75,000 dollars equipment at 10%
PV 75,000
time 5
rate 0.1
C $ 19,784.811
EPA fines: <u> </u><u>$ 18,500.00 </u>
differential: (1, 284.81)
Answer:
The answer is B.strategy implementation
Explanation:
Implementation involves putting the formulated strategy ; organizational design, structure, culture, control
