<h2>Answer:</h2>
It might make it harder to farm and take care of animals with men off fighting.
Supplies, like food, flour, or candles, might run out.
Fighting might take place in fields, destroying crops.
People might have to do without the things they need.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The country suffers from war faces lot of issues like ruining of homes and properties, destroy of crops, shortage of supplies like food, flour and other stuff. People might work without the things they require.
The Civil War hit life on the home front as well as the battleground. Families throughout the North and South suffered deficiencies of supplies, had their fields and homes ruined, or in some situations seized to be practiced for the war effort. Work of women and children changed in all aspects. For the first time, many women gained authority of farms or properties, served as nurses on and off the battleground, and even challenged in combat. Families were split separate as loved ones were forwarded off to fight.
The Apache were known for being powerful, brave, and aggressive. It is believed that because their language is similar, that the Apache and Navajo were once one ethnic group. The Apache were a large tribe, dating as far back as the early 1500s
Conservation should be given to smaller units to protect them from competition and provide more employment opportunities. Bigger firms should not be given protection.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The conservation which is important for the economy is the conservation given to the industries and the manufacturing units which are at smaller level to give employment opportunities to the people of the economy and protect them from competition.
But the conservation and protection to bigger firms should not be given, these should be exposed to competition so that they work in more efficient way and provide more choices to the people in the market.
Answer:
lol is this even legal......
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "-show North Vietnam that the United States was serious about the Paris peace talks." American leaders hoped that Nixon's Vietnamization program would have the following three results <span>-show North Vietnam that the United States was serious about the Paris peace talks</span>
