Answer:
Ayatollah Khomeini was in charge of the government of Iran during the hostage crisis.
Explanation:
The Iran hostage crisis took place after the US embassy in Tehran was seized by a group of several hundred students and took all those in the diplomatic mission as hostages. This event took place nine months after the victory of the Islamic revolution in Iran, when the power struggle was still going on between the forces participating in the revolution.
The attack on the embassy was carried out by students identifying with the Iranian Islamic left, however, it gained the support of all political forces except the liberals; led to the collapse of the government of Mehdi Bazargan, and in the long run gave political benefits mainly to Ruhollah Khomeini and his supporters.
On April 24, 1980, the US Army carried out a failed operation, the purpose of which was to recapture hostages. They were eventually released, after US-Iran negotiations, on January 20, 1981.
Answer:
The correct answer is C) All states should have same number of congressional representatives.
Explanation:
New Jersey wanted equal representatives for all States, regardless of the geographic size of the State or it's population.
New Jersey believed this was fair, gave each State an each representative and at the same time, provided a degree of Independence from the Federal Government.
However, this proposal was eventually rejected and eventually a new deal was reached which is now known as the Connecticut Compromise. A ratified form of this deal is currently included as part of the Constitution.
Answer: Please do not post curriculum/assessment content, or ask for answers to curriculum/assessment content (this is considered cheating). Assessments are meant to show what YOU know, not what the internet knows! Please read the lessons and do your own work! Ms. ELA Teacher
Explanation:
Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
Answer:
The biggest difference is that the death gods of Egypt were held in much higher esteem
Explanation:
no explanation for it
