1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavel [41]
3 years ago
15

Plz help not much time left

History
2 answers:
makkiz [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The North planned to split Southern troops to outnumber them in Colombia, and the confederate general fell for the tactic.  

Explanation:

faltersainse [42]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is A hope this helped
You might be interested in
The network of rivers in the South was important for
Kaylis [27]
Water baths and cooking

8 0
3 years ago
The Fashoda Affair is an example of
GrogVix [38]
Best Answer: T<span>he clash of european powers in controlling africa</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I will give you a crown pls hellppp
Bezzdna [24]

"Look at Sam Adams. If he looks as pleased as an old dog fox with a fat pullet in his mouth, we'll know they've agreed to violence if everything else fails." That is what I would say because it comments on Sam Adams being a role of power and the leader :)

8 0
3 years ago
What is one of the four basic principles of the 1628 Petition of Right?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

The petition sought recognition of four principles: no taxation without the consent of Parliament, no imprisonment without cause, no quartering of soldiers on subjects, and no martial law in peacetime.

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think that informal changes to the constitution are as important as formal amendments? Explain Why.
Vladimir79 [104]
A "Formal Amendment" is one that actually adds to or changes the US Constitution. It is ratified by the states and becomes law. 

<span>An "informal amendment"is a change to the meaning or interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. There is no real informal way to change the Constitution, and it's not an actual change to the wording of the Constitution; rather, it's the way we perceive the Constitution that changes. </span>

<span>The one that comes to mind is the equal rights amendment (1972) - which prohibits the inequality of men and women. Opponents say that the amendment is no longer needed, as the issues are already law</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the meaning of the following three parallel verses in terms of the parallelism used in each (see the above examples for
    14·2 answers
  • How were the coahuiltecan similar to the karankawa?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help! Our teacher doesn't teach us correct information, or relevant information to the topic we are currently learning ab
    12·1 answer
  • What plant was first cultivated in India?
    9·1 answer
  • What comitee is the most powerful in Congress
    11·2 answers
  • What did the civil rights act of 1968 end?
    7·2 answers
  • How was money suppose to be raised to pay for the expenses of the national confederation?
    10·2 answers
  • Did the united states achieve its objective for entering the vietnam war?.
    8·2 answers
  • What jobs did women do in ww1?
    7·1 answer
  • What empire fell during the 5th century and was replaced by the middle ages
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!