Answer: Alternative 3 will be selected.
Explanation:
The system that should be selected is the alternative that is better than the other alternatives by being higher than MARR if selected.
First compare A1 to A0
The rate of return here is 18% which is higher than the MARR of 15% so Alternative 1 should be chosen over A0 which is to do nothing.
Compare A1 to A2
If A2 is chosen over A1, the incremental return is 10% which is less than the MARR of 15% so A2 should not be chosen over A1. A1 should instead be chosen over A2.
Compare A1 to A3
If A3 is chosen over A1 then the incremental return would be 18%. This is higher than the MARR of 15% so Alternative 3 should be chosen over Alternative 1.
Alternative 3 should be chosen over A1 which should be chosen over A2 and A0.
A3 will therefore be selected.
Answer:
i think d it might not be right
Explanation:
Answer:
b. did not know of the reward when he returned the dog.
Explanation:
Laredo advertises for getting his dog back. This does not infer that the dog will only be returned when the reward will be paid.
Miguel did not know about the reward, so the reward in this case is not mandatory to be paid, but if Laredo initiates the reward himself, that can be accepted.
This is a clear demonstration of being kind and get what you know.
So if you do not know the facts, you are on fault.
The parol evidence rule has many exceptions, with possibly the most prevalent one being when <u>oral</u> evidence serves to clear up a(n) <u>ambiguous</u> part of an agreement.
More about the parol evidence rule:
The parol evidence rule is a principle of Anglo-American common law that controls the types of evidence that parties to a contract dispute may provide in an effort to ascertain the precise terms of the contract.
The parol evidence rule also prohibits parties who have reduced their agreement to a finalized written instrument from adding further evidence later on as proof of a different intent regarding the contract terms, such as the content of oral exchanges from earlier in the negotiation process.
Learn more about the parol evidence rule here:
brainly.com/question/15733971
#SPJ4
Answer:
$85,000
Explanation:
In the balance sheet, a company records the value of assets at their historical cost. Assets are recorded in the balance sheet at the price that they were acquired. Even if a company has strong reasons to believe that the value of an asset has increased, It cannot adjust its value in the books.
Harper will record the value of the land at $85,000. $93,000 represents the fair value of the property. Harper cannot record the fair value in the balance sheet. The fair value is only used when disposing of the property. The only way of verifying the fair value is by selling the property.
