Answer: The sequence is geometric
Step-by-step explanation:
In an arithmetic sequence, the consecutive terms differ by a common difference and this difference is linear.
Common difference = given term - the term before it
In geometric progression, the consecutive terms differ by a common ratio this difference is exponential.
Common ratio = given term/the term before it
Looking at the given sequence,
1) d = 6 - - 2 is not equal to - 18 - 6
Therefore, it is not an arithmetic sequence
2) r = 6/- 2 = - 18/6 = - 3
Therefore, it is a geometric sequence.
The polynomial's maximum value is relative.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
Is the maximum relative or absolute?</h3>
Here we have the polynomial:
Notice that the leading coefficient is negative, so, as x tends to negative infinite, V(x) will tend to positive infinite.
So we only have a relative maximum, because is local maximum (at x = 6.4), but the function can take larger values than that.
You can also check that on the graph of V(x), which you can see below:
If you want to learn more about maximums:
brainly.com/question/1938915
#SPJ1
Answer:-91/3
Step-by-step explanation: I hope it’s right
Given:
0.1% of all transactions are fraudulent
99% correct identification whether a transaction is fraudulent or not.
Scanned 5,000,000 transactions.
5,000,000 x 0.1% = 5,000 fraudulent transactions.
For me, there are 5,000 fraudulent transactions. This is based on the 0.1% rather than the 99%. Because the problem clearly states that the 0.1% of ALL transaction is identified as fraudulent. The 99% of the computer program only deals with the correct identification of the transaction as either fraudulent or not. For me, it is not a clear measure of the true number of fraudulent transactions.
36 x 25%
36 x .25
36 x .25 = 9.00
36 - 9.00
36 - 9.00 = $27
C. $27.00
