Answer:
Has bleeding stopped
Explanation:
One of the things that happens when a wound occurs is that it bleeds ,within no time you shall observe bleeding.
Yes the OTR has been able to identify the size of the wound, the condition of the tissue and the sign of infection, but how about bleeding, has bleeding stopped, how much blood has been lost due to bleeding. These are the signs and conditions the OTR didn't capture and it is very important ,because what if the patient has lost a lot of blood thereby leading to blood shortage ,if in the process of fixing the wound ,the blood of the patient is short and will need blood and no preparation has been made in providing blood is not been factored in the process, it can affect the healing of the wound on the patient.
So therefore, bleeding and amount of blood is very important that the OTR didn't capture in its analyses.
I think it’s a statement that explains the main idea
- The most true statement is that <u>D) </u><u>Shia Muslims</u><u> appear to be the </u><u>minority group</u><u> within </u><u>Islam</u><u>.</u>
- The best explanation for the split between Sunni and Shia is that it was over<u> D) A </u><u>disagreement </u><u>over the</u><u> leadership</u><u> of the</u><u> Islamic world</u><u> </u><u>after </u><u>the </u><u>death </u><u>of the </u><u>prophet Muhammad.</u>
The map is not included but it is accurate that the Shia are a minority in Islam because:
- Sunnis comprise 87% - 90% of all Muslims
- Shia comprise 10% - 13% of all Muslims
The Shia are therefore heavily outnumbered by the Sunni who have used their dominant position to occasionally marginalize the Shia.
The reason the Shia and the Sunni split was because they could not agree on who would lead the Muslims after the Prophet Muhammed died. Sunni wanted a man named Abu Bakr to lead and the Shia wanted Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib.
In conclusion, Islam has two main denominations which are the Sunni and the Shia but the Sunni outnumber of Shia who had split from the Sunni because they could not accept their choice for Muhammed's successor.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/1483771.</em>
Answer:
wood is a renewable resource while steel is non-renewable
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the one of the supporting statements for wood would be that wood is a renewable resource while steel is non-renewable. Meaning that if mistakes or changes need to be made the same wood can be reused. Also at the end of the life-cycle of the house, when it is torn down the entirety of the wood used can be repurposed for another usage.
