Alternative 1:A small D-cache with a hit rate of 94% and a hit access time of 1 cycle (assume that no additional cycles on top of the baseline CPI are added to the execution on a cache hit in this case).Alternative 2: A larger D-cache with a hit rate of 98% and the hit access time of 2 cycles (assume that every memory instruction that hits into the cache adds one additional cycle on top of the baseline CPI). a)[10%] Estimate the CPI metric for both of these designs and determine which of these two designsprovides better performance. Explain your answers!CPI = # Cycles / # InsnLet X = # InsnCPI = # Cycles / XAlternative 1:# Cycles = 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.94*2 + 0.06*150)CPI= 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.94*2 + 0.06*150) / X1= X(0.50*2 + 0.50(0.94*2 + 0.06*150) ) / X= 0.50*2 + 0.50(0.94*2 + 0.06*150)= 6.44Alternative 2:# Cycles = 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)CPI= 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150) / X2= X(0.50*2 + 0.50(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)) / X= 0.50*2 + 0.50(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)= 3.97Alternative 2 has a lower CPI, therefore Alternative 2 provides better performance.
Answer:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
int a=-156;//negative integer between -1 and -255.
a*=-1;//multiplying a to -1 so that it can become positive.
cout<<a;//printing a.
return 0;
}
Explanation:
The above written program is in C++ and in the program an integer a is defined with a negative value in the program it is -156.Then to convert it to positive integer we have to multiply a to -1 after that printing the value of a on the screen.
Answer:
Sure. In Unit test 5, it's looking for 1 instead of 0. You are returning 0 instead of 1.
0 requires 1 digit to express it and should therefore return 1.
In line 6, change the 0 to a 1.
