1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NikAS [45]
2 years ago
11

Which accurately describes the origin of the Islam religion? A man named Krishna killed numerous demons and purified the poisone

d waters of the Yamuna River. A man named Moses experienced visions from God to free the Hebrews from Egyptian slavery. A man named Siddhartha Gautama developed Islam through extensive mediation and self-reflection. A man named Muhammad experienced visions from Archangel Gabriel to create Islam.
History
1 answer:
Arada [10]2 years ago
7 0
BABA BLACK SHEEP HAVE YOU ANY WOOL but the answer is a
You might be interested in
What benefits were employees not entitled to during the industrial revolution ?
Keith_Richards [23]

C is your Answer:

Workers tried to get improved conditions and wages through labor unions. These unions often started friendly enough, but they soon became organizations for winning improvements by collective bargaining and strikes.

<span>Industrial workers also tried political action. The struggle to win the right to vote and to extend their political power was one of the major factors in the spread of democracy during the 19th century.</span>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Spain send conquistadors to the Americas?
Semenov [28]
They wanted to captuer it
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how can you summarize the 13th ammendent in 3 words? a.k.a "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment fo
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

Slavery is illegal.

No more slavery

USA slaves freed

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
The constitutional amendments passed during reconstruction
Art [367]

Answer:

Explanation:

1) bị coi là thất bại vì nhiều lý do

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • After the french and indian war, what are two reasons the british government began placing new taxes on the colonists
    15·1 answer
  • How did the first state constitutions address the concern that power should remain in the hands of the people?
    11·1 answer
  • 1.) Why did white Southern Democrats disenfranchise black men with things like the Jim Crow Laws?
    6·1 answer
  • In the mid-2000s, as a result of the Afghan people’s anger toward the United States,
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be another way to describe the Seneca Falls Convention?
    5·1 answer
  • Not someone reporting all my answers. Y'all really got the time to do it could neva
    10·2 answers
  • 1. ¿Por qué Martin Lutero no estaba de acuerdo con la iglesia católica?​
    11·1 answer
  • 2. How would you characterize Nat Turner and his followers?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not true of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
    11·1 answer
  • Hawaii
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!