Friar Laurene tries to delay the marriage by questioning the marriage and asking if it is going to fast. Friar Lawrence tries to delay the marriage of Paris and Juliet by questioning Paris about why the marriage is occurring so soon since he and Juliet have not even met.
Answer:
Keeping animals in Zoos has long been an issue. However, I think that keeping animals in Zoos is safe and fine because 1. They keep them safe from predators, 2. They are well taken care of, and 3. It prevents them from becoming extinct.
To begin with, I believe that keeping animals in Zoos is safe and okay because Zoos educate the public and create a respect for different species by bringing people and animals together. Poachers, habitat destruction, malnutrition, and predators are all threats to endangered animals, but zoos safeguard them by putting them into a secure setting. This is how animals can be kept safe. In conclusion, I think that Zoos keep animals safe because they are away from predators.
Second, seeing an animal up and personal is a far more intimate and unforgettable experience than seeing it in a nature documentary, and it is more likely to establish an empathic attitude toward animals. Some zoos assist in the rehabilitation of wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer desire or can care for. Animals are taken care of in zoos for that reason. Because of that, Zoos keep animals safe because animals get taken care of.
Additionally, Zoos help to keep species from becoming extinct. A species kept in captivity serves as a backup population in the event of a population crash or extinction in the wild. They can be bred up to produce foundation populations in Zoos since they are generally safe. Animals in Zoos are Safe for that reason.
All in all, I believe that keeping animals in Zoos is safe and okay because they are well taken care of. I think it's okay because it has its own benefits. What do you think about the idea of animals being in Zoos?
Explanation:
Please consider making this brainliest if this is what you were looking for :)
Answer:
sterile and devoid of setting
Explanation:
A dialogue is a form of communication between more than one person that involves messaging and feedback.
Therefore, if the dialogue is lacking in context that is relevant to the discussion, then such conversation is sterile (which means it's not producing good output) and devoid of setting (context)
THE ANSWER IS LETTER A BECAUSE IT ELABORATES ON WHAT IS ALREADY EXPLAINED ON THE FIRST SENTENCE
Early American and Colonial Literature
