The answer is b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe.
Let's look into it one by one:
a) It established unity and peace among European countries. -This is not true.
-Nationalism has caused the civilian of nations to want to protect themselves as well as get national glory by getting land. This caused territorial conflict and hostility between each nations instead of peace and unity.
b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe. - This is correct.
-As mentioned, nationalism has caused conflicts of territorial interest between nations. The nations were wary against one another that they might be attacked. They are also unwilling to back down in order to get national glory and show their superiority of the nation. This had indeed caused resentment and many negotiations went unsuccessful such as the disarmament conference.
c)The feelings of nationalism created a wave a optimism about peace in Europe. - This is incorrect.
- The feeling of nationalism had caused the up rise of aggression which made the nations to be suspicious towards one another causing negative impact about peace in Europe.
d) Nationalism had no impact on Europe during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.-This is false.
-As the above mentioned, nationalism had significant impact on the development in Europe.
Therefore the answer is b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
I feel like the quantinum supposed to be an apple
In practical presidential politics the outstanding question of the day is whether President Coolidge will be a candidate for renomination and reelection in 1928. The President has given no indication of his own attitude, nor is it likely that any direct announcement of his intention to be or not to be a candidate will be forthcoming until shortly in advance of the Republican National Convention. A premature announcement that he was not a candidate would measurably weaken, if not destroy, the President's influence with the leaders of his party, while an announcement of his candidacy would provide definite basis for the organization, both within and without the party, of opposition to his renomination and reelection.
Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address six weeks ago in which he described himself as “a working Republican who is both a personal friend and a political supporter of President Coolidge,” said he was taking it for granted “that when he thinks the right time has come he will make public statement of his unwillingness to have his name considered in connection with the Republican presidential nomination of 1928.” The President's good common sense, Dr. Butler believed, would dictate against “inviting certain defeat through injecting the third term issue into the campaign.”
As early as July 1926, the late Senator Albert Cummins, following his defeat and the defeat of other administration senators in the senatorial primaries, had expressed the opinion in a widely published statement that the President would not be a candidate in 1928, that he would have “had enough of it by that time.” Neither the Cummins statement, nor the Butler speech seven months later both of which were interpreted as “an effort to smoke out the President” brought any announcement from the White House of the President's attitude toward his renomination.
Answer:
<em>The correct answer is folding</em>
Explanation:
<em>Hope this helps Have a great day!</em>
The answer is B! The Battle of Saratoga is considered the turning point of the Revolutionary War!
