Answer:
i) $21 billion
ii) $0
iii) $0
Explanation:
GIVEN DATA : ( two countries )
At the end of year 2
net exports = $20 billion for Japan
Interest earned from assets = $1 billion for Japan
i) The balances for the current account for Japan
export value + interest earned from assets
= $20 billion + $1 billion = $21 billion
ii) Financial account for Japan
Financial account for Japan will be zero because there is no increase or decrease in number of its assets within the given period
iii) capital account for Japan
Capital account of Japan will will have a zero balance. this is because Capital account is used to record foreign investments, local investment and the reserve account as well. and there was no investment captured within the given time that was made by Japan
No stocks can affect any business in which you may shop at. not owning any stocks could affect you by price changes in the business
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A single use plan is basically a one time business transaction that is supposed to take place only once and should not be repeated in the future. In this case, the production plant has been used for more than 100 years, but once it is sold, its history and the company should no longer have any type of relationship with it.
The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct