I would say the answer is d but I am not positive.
<em>Tom found the memory box, which was for the baby, on the dusty closet shelf.</em>
<em />
<em>The sentence contains a squinting modifier, which is a kind of misplaced modifier. It creates ambiguity and confusion because it is not clear which item it modifies: whether the previous or the following phrase. In the sentence, the squinting modifier for the baby can refer to the memory box for the baby or for the baby on the dusty closet shelf, making two possible different meanings for the same sentence.</em>
<h2><em> HOPE IT HELPS (◕‿◕✿) </em></h2><h2><em> SMILE!!</em></h2>
Answer: I think it is safe to say that most people own at least one pet, well just imagine if that pet is taken out of no where for testing products. you would be upset right? especially if that animal ended up dying in the end. well pets are just as important than wild animals, so we should start caring about them too! Wild animals are taken everyday to test new products. if taking one animal is wrong then taking ANY animal is wrong.
In the eyes of the cobbler, Caesar was a hero and a noble man. The cobbler saw Caesar as one of them, one of them who was fortunate enough to rise in social status. On the other hand, Flavius and Murellus saw him as a fluke, a pretender and person not worthy of the praises that were being given to him. This opinion seems to have been cultivated in them by there belief that Caesar, who was from poorer upbringing and who unlike most of the high status people of Rome was not born into his status, infiltrated and defied the social structure and as such was not worthy of their very time.