There are two ways to do this but the way I prefer is to make one of the equations in terms of one variable and then 'plug this in' to the second equation. I will demonstrate
Look at equation 1,
this can quite easily be manipulated to show
.
Then because there is a y in the second equation (and both equations are simultaneous) we can 'plug in' our new equation where y is in the second one
which can then be solved for x since there is only one variable
and then with our x solution we can work out our y solution by using the equation we manipulated
.
So the solution to these equations is x=-2 when y=6
Answer:
f=-5/3 or -1.6repeating or -1 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
62 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
I won't make you wait longer sorry if I'm too late
Answer:
36.5 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
See attachment for the given data
Required
Which length is closest to 4.2lb
The given data is a linear dataset.
So, we start by calculating the slope (m)
Pick any two corresponding points from the table
So, we have:
So:
The linear equation is then calculated using:
This gives:
Open bracket
To get the length closest to 4.2lb,
we set
Then solve for x
So, we have:
Collect like terms
Solve for x
They each give $10 because the pattern is changing by 10.