Answer:
Some of the Exponents = -2 that is true, not 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's check one at a time.
(a)The 6 without an exponent is equivalent to the 6 having a 0 exponent.
and
= 6 (no exponent. 6
1 therefore this statement is False.
(b)The sum of the exponents is -2.
let's check , if the base is same we can add the exponents that is the exponent rule.(well established).
if we add exponents in the given expression we get.
, therefore we can see that the sum of the exponents = -2 this is true.
(c) An equivalent expression is 65.6-7, lets evaluate our above expression, it is equal to
which we can see that
,therefore this statement is false as well.
Answer:
The process of finding the derivative of dependent variable in an implicit function by differentiating each term separately by expressing the derivative of the dependent variable as a symbol and by solving the resulting expression for the symbol.
Answer:
<em>First.</em> Let us prove that the sum of three consecutive integers is divisible by 3.
Three consecutive integers can be written as k, k+1, k+2. Then, if we denote their sum as n:
n = k+(k+1)+(k+2) = 3k+3 = 3(k+1).
So, n can be written as 3 times another integer, thus n is divisible by 3.
<em>Second. </em>Let us prove that any number divisible by 3 can be written as the sum of three consecutive integers.
Assume that n is divisible by 3. The above proof suggest that we write it as
n=3(k+1)=3k+3=k + k + k +1+2 = k + (k+1) + (k+2).
As k, k+1, k+2 are three consecutive integers, we have completed our goal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
12 people can fit so the van had enough sests
Answer:
what?
Step-by-step explanation: